Why are individuals upset that Medical Insurance Covers Viagra but not Birth Controll?
Viagra is a drug that is for people beside certain conditions that need it so declare and sustain an erection. Birth Control is not a condition or medical issue. It is a choice! People that take Viagra can not choose to get an erection short the pill. Why is this such a big issue? Birth Control is someone's "Choice" to have sex without getting pregnant. Big difference nearby people.
Bill O'Reilly spoke about this closing night and he made some really good points. However "Planned Parenthood" is truism it is hypocritical to carry Viagra and not BC. Would someone please explain to me how it is being hypocritical to not cover a choice, and do cover a medical condition obliteration pill?
Answers:
Yeah, getting an erection is real important. If a man have to choose between buying food or buying viagra (if they needed it) I hate to see which they'd choose.
Birth control is not only used to enjoy sex without getting pregnant. Birth control can also regulate a woman's cycle and many birth controls enjoy been proven to clear up skin, also. Sounds to me like you are mortal the hypocrite thinking birth control is only used to prevent pregnancy, when it is used also for other medical conditions.
In many cases, contraceptives are used for more than just preventing pregnancy. Many forms of contraceptives are also used to treat dysmenorrhea (painful menstrual cramps during menstruation), menorrhagia (heavy or prolonged menstrual bleeding), endometriosis (when the endometrium--the tissue facing the uterus--grows outside of the uterus), metorrhagia (abnormal bleeding or spotting between menstrual periods), to regulate irregular menstrual cycles, to alleviate the symptoms of PMS and PMDD, to alleviate the pain of mittelschmerz (painful ovulation), to reduce the risk of PID (pelvic inflammatory disease), to drop off the risk of iron-deficiency anemia, to reduce the risk of fibrocystic breast conditions (benign cysts), to reduce the risk of ovarian cysts, to fall the risk of ectopic pregnacy (with exception to progesterone-only contraceptives), to prevent the risk of /reduce the growth of uterine fibroids, to prevent osteoporosis (oral contraceptive users are found to have an increase in bone density), as resourcefully as significantly reducing the risk of ovarian and endometrial cancers.
If you were a woman you would read between the lines that these are all medical issues and NOT choices.
I know MANY women that use different forms of contraception for medical conditions, not to prevent unwanted pregnancy. One of my best friends in big school was prescribed oral contraceptives for her severe endometriosis, and she be not sexually active. Her endometriosis was so stinging that it often kept her out of school or work, and her doctor told her that if she didn't try to own children young she would probably never have children--the scarring be that severe. That was not a choice she made. Another friend of mine was prescribed oral contraceptives because of life-threatening iron-deficieny anemia as a result of menorrhagia. She be adamant about "abiding herself" until marriage, so her pills were used to treat two different medical conditions. While remaining chaste until she be married WAS her choice, her anemia and menorrhagia most certainly were NOT.
I can have a handle on that those men that suffer from erectile dysfunction do not CHOOSE to suffer from such a condition, but those men that are beyond the years they should be siring children or do not wish to have any children are essentially taking medication like Viagra and Cialis as a VANITY drug. When you have an 80-year aged man asking his doctor for a prescription for Viagra because he can't achieve or maintain an erection--not so that he can hold children but so that he can engage in sexual activity--that is his choice, as okay as a vanity issue.
MY insurance (Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield) covers some birth control methods. Viagra, I'm not sure about as I'm a woman and conspicuously have no need of such medication. For those that own insurance that cover Viagra but not contraceptives, the reason they are upset is because of the multiple uses/benefits of contraceptives, as opposed to the uses of Viagra. What is Viagra used for? Primarily to treat erectile dysfunction and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). When you compare the conditions that these two medication treat or may help to alleviate the symptoms of, contraceptives treat far more.
"Doctors are not allowed to prescribe it basically for PMS reasons"? I'm curious where you get your information from. That is complete BS. If you have the SLIGHTEST inkling of the human (specifically female) anatomy and physiology, you would know that while the exact cause of PMS is not known, in that is a link to hormonal changes during a woman's menstrual cycle. Birth control pills, synthetic HORMONES, can lend a hand provide the body with the necessary hormones to regulate a woman's cycle, and thus...alleviate the symptoms of PMS.
You want to b*tch something like paying extra taxes and extra money to insurance companies because of a misconceived notion that women (both teenage and adult, alike) use contraceptives ONLY to prevent an unwanted pregnancies? Because "some girls can't hold their legs shut"? THAT works two ways. A girl just can't knock herself up. But that's stating the obvious.
Personally, if I be to b*tch about something, I would b*tch about these women that are have babies because they are either to uninformed/misinformed/uneducated about contraception methods, don't hold access to contraceptives, can't afford contraceptives, or their insurance does not cover contraceptives--and those same women are receiving Welfare benefits that MY tax dollars discharge for, because they did not use contraception. To me, THAT is an issue actually worthy of b*tching about. I would a bit see my tax dollars spent on people anyone properly educated on matters of sex and contraception, than have to support the Welfare children of people that do not use contraception.
What would YOU rather see your rates dollars go to: a woman that is trying to be responsible plenty to prevent the conception of a child that she does not want or is not capable of supporting, or supporting all of the children of that same woman because she did not use contraception?
Do you really want to know why medical insurance premiums increase? Because of the constant advance that are being made in the medical and scientific fields and the need to verbs the development of new technology and treatments (it's a indispensable and competitive market); because there is an increased demand for healthcare; because of an increased use of prescription medication (specifically brand name over generic); because unemployment rates verbs to rise, which means less folks have medical insurance, and this uncompensated care have an effect on those that ARE insured; because of health care benefit change mandated by legislation; and because of the state of the economy within general.
Please, prove me wrong. Source(s): Not only am I a woman working on pursuing a craft in the medical field, I work for a worldwide company that specializes within the developing, manufacturing and marketing of medical devices.
My insurance does not cover Viagra but does cover birth control, I own blue cross/blue shield.
I agree with the other girl. Birth control is not individual used for pregnancy prevention but also for the elimination of acne. and it is also used for lightening overly long and heavy period which also give cramps that prevent women from going about here day as normal.
Related Questions:
Bill O'Reilly spoke about this closing night and he made some really good points. However "Planned Parenthood" is truism it is hypocritical to carry Viagra and not BC. Would someone please explain to me how it is being hypocritical to not cover a choice, and do cover a medical condition obliteration pill?
Answers:
Yeah, getting an erection is real important. If a man have to choose between buying food or buying viagra (if they needed it) I hate to see which they'd choose.
Birth control is not only used to enjoy sex without getting pregnant. Birth control can also regulate a woman's cycle and many birth controls enjoy been proven to clear up skin, also. Sounds to me like you are mortal the hypocrite thinking birth control is only used to prevent pregnancy, when it is used also for other medical conditions.
In many cases, contraceptives are used for more than just preventing pregnancy. Many forms of contraceptives are also used to treat dysmenorrhea (painful menstrual cramps during menstruation), menorrhagia (heavy or prolonged menstrual bleeding), endometriosis (when the endometrium--the tissue facing the uterus--grows outside of the uterus), metorrhagia (abnormal bleeding or spotting between menstrual periods), to regulate irregular menstrual cycles, to alleviate the symptoms of PMS and PMDD, to alleviate the pain of mittelschmerz (painful ovulation), to reduce the risk of PID (pelvic inflammatory disease), to drop off the risk of iron-deficiency anemia, to reduce the risk of fibrocystic breast conditions (benign cysts), to reduce the risk of ovarian cysts, to fall the risk of ectopic pregnacy (with exception to progesterone-only contraceptives), to prevent the risk of /reduce the growth of uterine fibroids, to prevent osteoporosis (oral contraceptive users are found to have an increase in bone density), as resourcefully as significantly reducing the risk of ovarian and endometrial cancers.
If you were a woman you would read between the lines that these are all medical issues and NOT choices.
I know MANY women that use different forms of contraception for medical conditions, not to prevent unwanted pregnancy. One of my best friends in big school was prescribed oral contraceptives for her severe endometriosis, and she be not sexually active. Her endometriosis was so stinging that it often kept her out of school or work, and her doctor told her that if she didn't try to own children young she would probably never have children--the scarring be that severe. That was not a choice she made. Another friend of mine was prescribed oral contraceptives because of life-threatening iron-deficieny anemia as a result of menorrhagia. She be adamant about "abiding herself" until marriage, so her pills were used to treat two different medical conditions. While remaining chaste until she be married WAS her choice, her anemia and menorrhagia most certainly were NOT.
I can have a handle on that those men that suffer from erectile dysfunction do not CHOOSE to suffer from such a condition, but those men that are beyond the years they should be siring children or do not wish to have any children are essentially taking medication like Viagra and Cialis as a VANITY drug. When you have an 80-year aged man asking his doctor for a prescription for Viagra because he can't achieve or maintain an erection--not so that he can hold children but so that he can engage in sexual activity--that is his choice, as okay as a vanity issue.
MY insurance (Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield) covers some birth control methods. Viagra, I'm not sure about as I'm a woman and conspicuously have no need of such medication. For those that own insurance that cover Viagra but not contraceptives, the reason they are upset is because of the multiple uses/benefits of contraceptives, as opposed to the uses of Viagra. What is Viagra used for? Primarily to treat erectile dysfunction and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). When you compare the conditions that these two medication treat or may help to alleviate the symptoms of, contraceptives treat far more.
"Doctors are not allowed to prescribe it basically for PMS reasons"? I'm curious where you get your information from. That is complete BS. If you have the SLIGHTEST inkling of the human (specifically female) anatomy and physiology, you would know that while the exact cause of PMS is not known, in that is a link to hormonal changes during a woman's menstrual cycle. Birth control pills, synthetic HORMONES, can lend a hand provide the body with the necessary hormones to regulate a woman's cycle, and thus...alleviate the symptoms of PMS.
You want to b*tch something like paying extra taxes and extra money to insurance companies because of a misconceived notion that women (both teenage and adult, alike) use contraceptives ONLY to prevent an unwanted pregnancies? Because "some girls can't hold their legs shut"? THAT works two ways. A girl just can't knock herself up. But that's stating the obvious.
Personally, if I be to b*tch about something, I would b*tch about these women that are have babies because they are either to uninformed/misinformed/uneducated about contraception methods, don't hold access to contraceptives, can't afford contraceptives, or their insurance does not cover contraceptives--and those same women are receiving Welfare benefits that MY tax dollars discharge for, because they did not use contraception. To me, THAT is an issue actually worthy of b*tching about. I would a bit see my tax dollars spent on people anyone properly educated on matters of sex and contraception, than have to support the Welfare children of people that do not use contraception.
What would YOU rather see your rates dollars go to: a woman that is trying to be responsible plenty to prevent the conception of a child that she does not want or is not capable of supporting, or supporting all of the children of that same woman because she did not use contraception?
Do you really want to know why medical insurance premiums increase? Because of the constant advance that are being made in the medical and scientific fields and the need to verbs the development of new technology and treatments (it's a indispensable and competitive market); because there is an increased demand for healthcare; because of an increased use of prescription medication (specifically brand name over generic); because unemployment rates verbs to rise, which means less folks have medical insurance, and this uncompensated care have an effect on those that ARE insured; because of health care benefit change mandated by legislation; and because of the state of the economy within general.
Please, prove me wrong. Source(s): Not only am I a woman working on pursuing a craft in the medical field, I work for a worldwide company that specializes within the developing, manufacturing and marketing of medical devices.
My insurance does not cover Viagra but does cover birth control, I own blue cross/blue shield.
I agree with the other girl. Birth control is not individual used for pregnancy prevention but also for the elimination of acne. and it is also used for lightening overly long and heavy period which also give cramps that prevent women from going about here day as normal.
Related Questions:
- I enjoy the Medical Card but I hold a cavity. Will my insurance compensate for anastesia?
- Health insurance help society near the financial aspect of medical expenses.?
- OUTRAGEOUS MEDICAL BILLS NO INSURANCE IS THERE HELP?
- Shouldnt Men surrounded by America Pay smaller quantity for Medical Insurance?
- What does it indicate when a patients match is SPENDDOWN UNMET when have medical insurance??