Since you presently can enjoy anyone on your down as a dependent, or on your medical or existence insurance as?
a significant other is there really any reason for couples to win married? it used to be people got married for insurance and to pass the children the same names, etc, but in a minute everyone just does what ever so is marriage really needed aside from doing it as a religious ceremony? Should merely people who practice their religion get married while adjectives others just list respectively other as significant others and not actually marry? Is that how the future will be? People anyone commited to each other and living together but not married?
Answers:
both marriage and monogamy are oppressive concepts.
In Australia we have law covering de facto relationships and basically if you live together for 2 years or live together with a child later you have almost exactly the same rights/obligations as if you're married.
But population still get married. It's been dropping over times past few years - as I hear it has been contained by the USA as well - but it still remains an important social/cultural/religious tradition for some family.
I think it should be a choice, if the legal or ceremonial aspects of it is far-reaching to people, they should be allowed to make that choice.
In the USA it seem the laws on common canon marriages are very different so it does appear safer to get married - there are things save for insurance right?
It is easier to end a relationship when in attendance is no legal tie. Marriage is a legal partnership and it is harder to newly walk away. Married couples are more likely to try to work things out more so than non married couples. I find it strange near are so many same sex couples who would love the opportunity to marry yet for those who can marry heaps don't want to.
Here are a few other benefits of marriage
Federal tax benefits
Inheritance automatically contained by the absence of a will
Social Security, Medicare, and disability benefits for spouses.
Veterans and military benefits for spouses
Married 20+ years
Related Questions:
Answers:
both marriage and monogamy are oppressive concepts.
In Australia we have law covering de facto relationships and basically if you live together for 2 years or live together with a child later you have almost exactly the same rights/obligations as if you're married.
But population still get married. It's been dropping over times past few years - as I hear it has been contained by the USA as well - but it still remains an important social/cultural/religious tradition for some family.
I think it should be a choice, if the legal or ceremonial aspects of it is far-reaching to people, they should be allowed to make that choice.
In the USA it seem the laws on common canon marriages are very different so it does appear safer to get married - there are things save for insurance right?
It is easier to end a relationship when in attendance is no legal tie. Marriage is a legal partnership and it is harder to newly walk away. Married couples are more likely to try to work things out more so than non married couples. I find it strange near are so many same sex couples who would love the opportunity to marry yet for those who can marry heaps don't want to.
Here are a few other benefits of marriage
Federal tax benefits
Inheritance automatically contained by the absence of a will
Social Security, Medicare, and disability benefits for spouses.
Veterans and military benefits for spouses
Married 20+ years
Related Questions:
- McCain be criticized for his proposal to due medical insurance benefits: immediately Barry and his cohorts propose to?
- I am 23 how can i bring back back for medical insurance for me i own no kids and lots of helth problems?
- Is in that any abet from the govt. towards my medical insurance, since i am a full time student and work 3 days?
- Aetna Medical insurance provider application network site?
- Does anyone know of a polite worldwide medical insurance plan for a traveler?
