If Canada switched to private medical insurance, would Canadians be optimistic or upset?
If Canada went to the USA's system where you earnings deductible plus out of pocket premiums from healthcare providers like Aetna, BlueCross/Blueshield, and have private strength care corporations manage perfectionism assets. And you pay about $3,500 for an MRI scan.
Or would you prefer the current system that's be implemented in Canada for 45+ years?
Or some other hybrid of the 2?
Answers:
When CBC aired the tv show "the greatest Canadian," the person who get the most votes was Tommy Douglas, founder of public health attention to detail in Saskatchewan. Most believe he won the show based on how much general public value his contribution to Canadian society. We are committed to public health protection. Source(s): http://www.cbc.ca/greatest/
Many Canadians already use private medical insurance in the public healthcare system.
Many companies in Canada enjoy group insurance services. The company agrees on what will be covered, such as up to $200 every two years for eyewear, $50 deductible on dental care per person per year, pay-out of a semi private room during medical treatment, etc.
Every year, people who are covered by private health plans are allowed a levy credit on the public healthcare deductible for each month that they were covered by the plan.
Many Canadians are against have both private and public clinics/hospitals. However, in my opinion, citizens should be allowed to pay a bit more and go to a private clinic if they want to, as long as the element of service is comparable. Those who could afford it would use the private clinic so they don't have to spend hours in a waiting room, and consequently there would be less citizens waiting at the public clinic, so the people who cannot afford a private clinic can have lower continue times at the public clinic.
Of course, this topic is highly debated by experts, politicians, and the average entity. So far, the "no privatization" side has won out.
I don't want to see anything resembling American style "vigour care" in this country. What we have could be enhanced, but I definitely prefer it over what the US has.
I couldn't live with a system like the American one.
People who hold private medicare in the UK tend to flee to the public system and clog it up if anything serious happens.
I could never live beside the US system. Everyone has the right to medical care when needed.
HOWEVER, I would resembling to be able to change my doctor. Mine retired a while ago and I be automatically given to this new doctor. She is young and starting her family unit so she is NEVER around, always on Mat. Leave. When she is around it takes 2 months to take an appointment, even in the case of an emergency. and when i DO see her, she doesn't seem to be to care. Just want's to get me out as brisk as possible. Won't discuss anything just throws drugs at all my problems (even when they aren't needed) Yet not a soul else is willing to take me as a forgiving because I have been assigned a doctor. It is a nouns of crap that I should not be allowed to chose my doctor.
I guess what I'm saying is that a hybrid of the 2 would work. nothing that includes us paying for our robustness care. Even if they found that was best you know our taces won't drop anyways so near is no point it would just be stupid. But I think allowing me to chose my doctor, have less wait times etc. They stipulation to offer incentives. The way England does. If you attain a patient to quit smoking...you get a bonus. If you find a patient to lose 10% of their weight...you get hold of a bonus etc etc.
after watching sicko, i'd be pretty upset.
Related Questions:
Or would you prefer the current system that's be implemented in Canada for 45+ years?
Or some other hybrid of the 2?
Answers:
When CBC aired the tv show "the greatest Canadian," the person who get the most votes was Tommy Douglas, founder of public health attention to detail in Saskatchewan. Most believe he won the show based on how much general public value his contribution to Canadian society. We are committed to public health protection. Source(s): http://www.cbc.ca/greatest/
Many Canadians already use private medical insurance in the public healthcare system.
Many companies in Canada enjoy group insurance services. The company agrees on what will be covered, such as up to $200 every two years for eyewear, $50 deductible on dental care per person per year, pay-out of a semi private room during medical treatment, etc.
Every year, people who are covered by private health plans are allowed a levy credit on the public healthcare deductible for each month that they were covered by the plan.
Many Canadians are against have both private and public clinics/hospitals. However, in my opinion, citizens should be allowed to pay a bit more and go to a private clinic if they want to, as long as the element of service is comparable. Those who could afford it would use the private clinic so they don't have to spend hours in a waiting room, and consequently there would be less citizens waiting at the public clinic, so the people who cannot afford a private clinic can have lower continue times at the public clinic.
Of course, this topic is highly debated by experts, politicians, and the average entity. So far, the "no privatization" side has won out.
I don't want to see anything resembling American style "vigour care" in this country. What we have could be enhanced, but I definitely prefer it over what the US has.
I couldn't live with a system like the American one.
People who hold private medicare in the UK tend to flee to the public system and clog it up if anything serious happens.
I could never live beside the US system. Everyone has the right to medical care when needed.
HOWEVER, I would resembling to be able to change my doctor. Mine retired a while ago and I be automatically given to this new doctor. She is young and starting her family unit so she is NEVER around, always on Mat. Leave. When she is around it takes 2 months to take an appointment, even in the case of an emergency. and when i DO see her, she doesn't seem to be to care. Just want's to get me out as brisk as possible. Won't discuss anything just throws drugs at all my problems (even when they aren't needed) Yet not a soul else is willing to take me as a forgiving because I have been assigned a doctor. It is a nouns of crap that I should not be allowed to chose my doctor.
I guess what I'm saying is that a hybrid of the 2 would work. nothing that includes us paying for our robustness care. Even if they found that was best you know our taces won't drop anyways so near is no point it would just be stupid. But I think allowing me to chose my doctor, have less wait times etc. They stipulation to offer incentives. The way England does. If you attain a patient to quit smoking...you get a bonus. If you find a patient to lose 10% of their weight...you get hold of a bonus etc etc.
after watching sicko, i'd be pretty upset.
Related Questions:
- I want to bring back a medical insurance. Whats the best odds for me?
- How much do you or your parents income for medical insurance, and what does it cover?
- When asking for a gross increase can an employer bring up use of medical insurance as a origin for no incres?
- An uncle of mine is dying of liver anticlimax. He is refuse medical attention. Will his insurance be within effect?
- I hold a examine just about my medical insurance! :(?