Should portliness be considered a liability contained by insurance?
If you think about it, chubbiness is an addiction to food. It's harmful to the body, which causes a angle in medical bills.
Answers:
NO... obesity can be controlled... therefore it shouldn't be a liability...
obesity is not truly always caused by addiction to foods. within are other possible reasons why some people own a weight problem.
1. some are on medication that can cause a soul to gain insane amounts of weight. such as steroids for internal medical ailments.
2. they could be recently confined contained by a wheel chair. race who have a slow metabolism and need to be involved to maintain there cargo will gain the weight quickly but for able to move as one use to.
3. a person can be place on depression medication. which the meds them selves can put on the cargo along with the mental emotional problems them self can be a effect.
one is considered obese at 30 plus extra pounds. however, SSI doesn't find obesity a liability or a medical issue until the person hits 300 pounds. that really is tilting the mount. so i think it's fair. obese relatives don't take advantage of the system considering SSI have strict guidelines these days.
no, i am not an obese woman. just well-read on the topic
Yes, it should.
Obesity is not an addiction to food or anything else. It's a condition where on earth excess body fat has accumulate to the point where it may adversely affect health.
I know individuals who are obese who have significant health problems and I know family who are obese who have no other health problems.
I weigh give or take a few 250 at 6'2". I am considered obese, by medical standards. Other than my weight, I am physically healthy. You report to me...Is my weight a liability?
I was of late reading an article about a judge order a pizza place to pay for an employee's weight-loss surgery because it might help near a back surgery they have to progress through due to a work-related injury.
But to answer your question, no I don't conjecture it shoud be included as a liability in insurance policies.
Obesity is not an addiction to food. If you wanna get scientific, we're all addicted to food, we need it to survive. But we CONTROL how much and which types of food we intake. Granted, not adjectives obesity is caused from over-eating, etc. I know a few relations who've had to take steroids for other medical conditions and they've have their weight triple due to that.
So I guess maybe it should be considered a liabilty IF it can be proven that the plumpness was caused by something excluding being a pig and stuffing your face near junk.
You are passageway off. Obesity can be caused by food but it can also be cause by a lot of other things. You need to do some research formerly you write about things you obviously know nil about.
People who are addicted to medicine enjoy to go to rehab and they pay for those out of their own pockets.
So contained by your own theory, Popping pills should be considered a liability in insurance?
Absolutely. Obesity increases the risk of health problems considerably, so it definitely should be considered a liability contained by insurance.
While it's true that obesity is a health risk, associates take it so personally. I reflect insurance should be about the facts, though, so I think it should. And I'm a chubby girl, so don't assume I'm biased here. If you smoke, your insurance costs more, what's so different about obesity? People who weigh however much are more imagined to need a chiropractor, become diabetic, have a heart problems and breathing issues, etc.
expurgate: As far as what Debi said, she has a point, but almost all obese inhabitants could prevent their obesity (or at least lessen it significantly) next to self-control of some kind, so you can't really articulate this assumption is due to a lack of knowledge.
It already is....
Although women beside ten to twenty pounds excess weight live almost ten years longer than women who are "at weight" or underweight. Source(s): My meds for allergies and asthma and pain rationale me to weigh a lot more than I'd like to...but at smallest I'm not going above the 160s.... And I still haven't found someone who moves faster than me at work...even when I'm injured....
It is considered a liability to insurance already. They're more likely to enjoy a heart attack, diabetes, and much more.
NO it should not be a liability in insurance
Marriage should be a liability since it causes stress.
Yes
Yes
Related Questions:
Answers:
NO... obesity can be controlled... therefore it shouldn't be a liability...
obesity is not truly always caused by addiction to foods. within are other possible reasons why some people own a weight problem.
1. some are on medication that can cause a soul to gain insane amounts of weight. such as steroids for internal medical ailments.
2. they could be recently confined contained by a wheel chair. race who have a slow metabolism and need to be involved to maintain there cargo will gain the weight quickly but for able to move as one use to.
3. a person can be place on depression medication. which the meds them selves can put on the cargo along with the mental emotional problems them self can be a effect.
one is considered obese at 30 plus extra pounds. however, SSI doesn't find obesity a liability or a medical issue until the person hits 300 pounds. that really is tilting the mount. so i think it's fair. obese relatives don't take advantage of the system considering SSI have strict guidelines these days.
no, i am not an obese woman. just well-read on the topic
Yes, it should.
Obesity is not an addiction to food or anything else. It's a condition where on earth excess body fat has accumulate to the point where it may adversely affect health.
I know individuals who are obese who have significant health problems and I know family who are obese who have no other health problems.
I weigh give or take a few 250 at 6'2". I am considered obese, by medical standards. Other than my weight, I am physically healthy. You report to me...Is my weight a liability?
I was of late reading an article about a judge order a pizza place to pay for an employee's weight-loss surgery because it might help near a back surgery they have to progress through due to a work-related injury.
But to answer your question, no I don't conjecture it shoud be included as a liability in insurance policies.
Obesity is not an addiction to food. If you wanna get scientific, we're all addicted to food, we need it to survive. But we CONTROL how much and which types of food we intake. Granted, not adjectives obesity is caused from over-eating, etc. I know a few relations who've had to take steroids for other medical conditions and they've have their weight triple due to that.
So I guess maybe it should be considered a liabilty IF it can be proven that the plumpness was caused by something excluding being a pig and stuffing your face near junk.
You are passageway off. Obesity can be caused by food but it can also be cause by a lot of other things. You need to do some research formerly you write about things you obviously know nil about.
People who are addicted to medicine enjoy to go to rehab and they pay for those out of their own pockets.
So contained by your own theory, Popping pills should be considered a liability in insurance?
Absolutely. Obesity increases the risk of health problems considerably, so it definitely should be considered a liability contained by insurance.
While it's true that obesity is a health risk, associates take it so personally. I reflect insurance should be about the facts, though, so I think it should. And I'm a chubby girl, so don't assume I'm biased here. If you smoke, your insurance costs more, what's so different about obesity? People who weigh however much are more imagined to need a chiropractor, become diabetic, have a heart problems and breathing issues, etc.
expurgate: As far as what Debi said, she has a point, but almost all obese inhabitants could prevent their obesity (or at least lessen it significantly) next to self-control of some kind, so you can't really articulate this assumption is due to a lack of knowledge.
It already is....
Although women beside ten to twenty pounds excess weight live almost ten years longer than women who are "at weight" or underweight. Source(s): My meds for allergies and asthma and pain rationale me to weigh a lot more than I'd like to...but at smallest I'm not going above the 160s.... And I still haven't found someone who moves faster than me at work...even when I'm injured....
It is considered a liability to insurance already. They're more likely to enjoy a heart attack, diabetes, and much more.
NO it should not be a liability in insurance
Marriage should be a liability since it causes stress.
Yes
Yes
Related Questions:
- What insurance liability does the charity trimming aid hold?
- Is at hand such a point as manipulate psychotherapy insurance( not liability ins., Im not a squeeze therapist)?
- Mobile Tire Changer desires General Liability Insurance?
- Professional liability insurance for a Nursing Assistant?
- What it would cost per year for liability insurance for fastener tech. contained by s.c.?