Do you expect the Public Insurance OPTION would drive private companies out of business?
Why?
Dozens of countries have public health insurance, and tons have single payer insurance, where adjectives citizens are automaticall covered unless they opt out.
And yet, in EVERY SINGLE one of these countries, private insurance still exists. Not one have driven all private insurance companies out of business.
So what proof do you have finance up your claim? Where has this happened surrounded by the past? Are you just speculating, in need any evidence at all? What makes you regard as our situation will be different than every other country?
Answers:
No, not at all.
I think that public and private vigour sectors would strike a balance, and I work within healthcare.
I think that federally-subsidized healthcare would keep the costs of private healthcare somewhere down below the stratosphere, and that private institutions would rouse the government to ensure more service that was more personally-tailored than one-size-fits-all.
It seem like many Americans appropriate waaaaay too black-and-white a view of things; there's this "if it's broke, throw it away" rather than "if it's broke, fix it" mentality, but what do you expect from a country that run up trillions in debt buying plasma screen TV's and big SUV's on their home equity lines of credit from 03-07?
Soviet-style state bottom-grade guardianship = not good. American-style pay-through-the-nose care = not righteous. We pay too much here in the US, it's as simple as that. As long as pharmaceutical companies are going to gain billions of dollars in federal aid to develop cures for ailments, the populace should be able to bring back returns from their investments without having to clear $150/bottle.
There are public and private schools. There are public and private hospitals already. There are public and private police and fire protection. Will a public condition insurance option drive private insurance companies out of business? Maybe some of the more inefficient ones. Will the private insurance companies business operations convert? Sure, hopefully for the good.
Where I live, we've seen a significant increase in the number of companies selling insurance since it be changed to a mandatory health insurance requirement.
This is what lobbyists and private insurance companies, plus any Republican (and perhaps even a few Democratic) Congressmen or Senators who own stock within affected companies, would have us deliberate. The Public Insurance Option would actually provide a checks and balances item to health care, because private companies would hold to remain competitive by keeping costs under control. Pharmaceutical companies (a part of the growing strength care costs) have have free reign under Bush family presidencies (who own ample portions of stock), spending more on lobbying than any other industry (Rossi, 2004). According to Rossi, "for every one U.S. congressperson, there are 4.5 drug industry lobbyists swarming around" (p. 81). There is and will continue to be STRONG resistance to any type of price controls or regulations such as the Obama leadership has proposed, even though these regulations would serve the American public extremely well. Why the hostility? MONEY. GREED!---a greed that has been allowed to run rampant throughout the Bush/Cheney years calling the shots, setting the policies, and surrounded by general screwing the American inhabitants. Source(s): Melissa Rossi (2004), "What Every American Should Know About Who's Really Running the World: The People, Corporations, and Organizations that Control Our Future" (NY: Plume Group).
"The Republican Noise Machine: Right-Wing Media and How It Corrupts Democracy" by ex-conservative insider David Brock.
Obama's proposal for universal healthcare currently will with the sole purpose cover about one-third of the population. The democrats have no answer on how they are going to reward for this public insurance, yet we all know it will be another burden on the taxpayers. What assurance can you proposition that in America's case private companies will not be driven out of business, going away the majority of the country without any health insurance at adjectives or any options for coverage? The government is mismanaging crucial issues now and cannot provide healthcare for this entire nation.
No, not if the private companies have the power to levy taxes and print money like the federal management does.
Then they can make just as frequent pie in the sky promises.
PS Several Democrats have said that the "public option" is expected to eventually crowd out private insurance. And at hand is NOTHING in the proposal to prevent private employers from dropping their plans en masse. Estimates are that as various as 110 million Americans will be displaced. Obama knows this.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB12395854…
http://www.buffalonews.com/opinion/anoth…
http://www.heritage.org/Research/HealthC…
If the government think they can run health insurance better than the Private sector then they should dance ahead and do it.
HOWEVER, they need to run it as an independent entity. They can not draw funds from outside sources.
If I choose to have Government condition care then I will check that box on the W4 form and they can manufacture the appropriate tax deductions. If not I will dance with my own carrier and not retribution into the system.
That seems fair. They be aware of they can run it better...let them compete. It's when we are forced to use or pay for Gov Care that the problems arise.
Let them compete contained by a free market if they are convinced they can do it better.
Private school still exist. But, they are priced so high they are pretty much off precincts to the common people. The same entity will happen in the robustness insurance industry. Employers will start dropping coverage to save money and pushing people on to the senate program.
want proof?
Medicare.
they pay docs 40% of what the docs would charge to maintain their practices going.
that is why some of the best doc's don't take patients on medicare
the ones that do pretty much do it out of the holiness of their hearts.
if every patient within a docs practice were a medicare patient the doc would be out of biz in the blink of an eye.
this is how the public option would work. why? because that's the only path the govt. would be able to keep cost down. underneath pay the providers.
real reorganize would start with tort reform.
Related Questions:
Dozens of countries have public health insurance, and tons have single payer insurance, where adjectives citizens are automaticall covered unless they opt out.
And yet, in EVERY SINGLE one of these countries, private insurance still exists. Not one have driven all private insurance companies out of business.
So what proof do you have finance up your claim? Where has this happened surrounded by the past? Are you just speculating, in need any evidence at all? What makes you regard as our situation will be different than every other country?
Answers:
No, not at all.
I think that public and private vigour sectors would strike a balance, and I work within healthcare.
I think that federally-subsidized healthcare would keep the costs of private healthcare somewhere down below the stratosphere, and that private institutions would rouse the government to ensure more service that was more personally-tailored than one-size-fits-all.
It seem like many Americans appropriate waaaaay too black-and-white a view of things; there's this "if it's broke, throw it away" rather than "if it's broke, fix it" mentality, but what do you expect from a country that run up trillions in debt buying plasma screen TV's and big SUV's on their home equity lines of credit from 03-07?
Soviet-style state bottom-grade guardianship = not good. American-style pay-through-the-nose care = not righteous. We pay too much here in the US, it's as simple as that. As long as pharmaceutical companies are going to gain billions of dollars in federal aid to develop cures for ailments, the populace should be able to bring back returns from their investments without having to clear $150/bottle.
There are public and private schools. There are public and private hospitals already. There are public and private police and fire protection. Will a public condition insurance option drive private insurance companies out of business? Maybe some of the more inefficient ones. Will the private insurance companies business operations convert? Sure, hopefully for the good.
Where I live, we've seen a significant increase in the number of companies selling insurance since it be changed to a mandatory health insurance requirement.
This is what lobbyists and private insurance companies, plus any Republican (and perhaps even a few Democratic) Congressmen or Senators who own stock within affected companies, would have us deliberate. The Public Insurance Option would actually provide a checks and balances item to health care, because private companies would hold to remain competitive by keeping costs under control. Pharmaceutical companies (a part of the growing strength care costs) have have free reign under Bush family presidencies (who own ample portions of stock), spending more on lobbying than any other industry (Rossi, 2004). According to Rossi, "for every one U.S. congressperson, there are 4.5 drug industry lobbyists swarming around" (p. 81). There is and will continue to be STRONG resistance to any type of price controls or regulations such as the Obama leadership has proposed, even though these regulations would serve the American public extremely well. Why the hostility? MONEY. GREED!---a greed that has been allowed to run rampant throughout the Bush/Cheney years calling the shots, setting the policies, and surrounded by general screwing the American inhabitants. Source(s): Melissa Rossi (2004), "What Every American Should Know About Who's Really Running the World: The People, Corporations, and Organizations that Control Our Future" (NY: Plume Group).
"The Republican Noise Machine: Right-Wing Media and How It Corrupts Democracy" by ex-conservative insider David Brock.
Obama's proposal for universal healthcare currently will with the sole purpose cover about one-third of the population. The democrats have no answer on how they are going to reward for this public insurance, yet we all know it will be another burden on the taxpayers. What assurance can you proposition that in America's case private companies will not be driven out of business, going away the majority of the country without any health insurance at adjectives or any options for coverage? The government is mismanaging crucial issues now and cannot provide healthcare for this entire nation.
No, not if the private companies have the power to levy taxes and print money like the federal management does.
Then they can make just as frequent pie in the sky promises.
PS Several Democrats have said that the "public option" is expected to eventually crowd out private insurance. And at hand is NOTHING in the proposal to prevent private employers from dropping their plans en masse. Estimates are that as various as 110 million Americans will be displaced. Obama knows this.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB12395854…
http://www.buffalonews.com/opinion/anoth…
http://www.heritage.org/Research/HealthC…
If the government think they can run health insurance better than the Private sector then they should dance ahead and do it.
HOWEVER, they need to run it as an independent entity. They can not draw funds from outside sources.
If I choose to have Government condition care then I will check that box on the W4 form and they can manufacture the appropriate tax deductions. If not I will dance with my own carrier and not retribution into the system.
That seems fair. They be aware of they can run it better...let them compete. It's when we are forced to use or pay for Gov Care that the problems arise.
Let them compete contained by a free market if they are convinced they can do it better.
Private school still exist. But, they are priced so high they are pretty much off precincts to the common people. The same entity will happen in the robustness insurance industry. Employers will start dropping coverage to save money and pushing people on to the senate program.
want proof?
Medicare.
they pay docs 40% of what the docs would charge to maintain their practices going.
that is why some of the best doc's don't take patients on medicare
the ones that do pretty much do it out of the holiness of their hearts.
if every patient within a docs practice were a medicare patient the doc would be out of biz in the blink of an eye.
this is how the public option would work. why? because that's the only path the govt. would be able to keep cost down. underneath pay the providers.
real reorganize would start with tort reform.
Related Questions:
- A relative received a cheque from an insurance company mistakenly and he bank it. Is he liable to be sued?
- If you've be cancelled by an insurance company, at anytime can you budge rear or do you own a consistent amount?
- Can a company set up condition benefits short using an insurance agent?
- What are your thoughts and morale on the 80 million dollar bail out of an insurance company?
- What did Insurance Companies hold to do beside the Triangle Shirtwaist Fire court baggage?