Will the Bushbaby in fact veto the extension of strength insurance for unibsured children?

You guessed right. The answer is no because when it comes down to it he does not have the guts or the clout to face down the Republican congressmen who will own to stand for reelection in 2008. He only have one all abiding principle, political expediency.
Answers:
oh puhlease...its the same liberal issue over and over again that no one on the vanished seems to pay attention to or nurture about...its called WHO PAYS FOR IT. this program be expanded by the pelosi/reid regime much more beyond what it was intended and creates de facto socialized medicine. if you want a front strip assesment of how failed the billary health insurance plan and welfare scheme like this one are, talk to any doctor that have to take payments from the government for services preformed. trust me on this one liberal, youll receive an earful....
once again a liberal in need of a certainty checker...yawn.....
Whatever, Sunshine.
I hope he vetoes it. It's an irresponsible bill.
Health Insurance,they are only good if they necessitate clients to insure,claiming is one of the hardest thing to do,Supposed to be it's the companies Obligation,by the Gov't it must be subsidized,good luck to adjectives the children in our Future to be a World at Peace...Bushbaby will be organized if everybody will knew their obligations&responsibilities into authenticity even you... Source(s): God'speedingraces
I hope he veto it. Parents who are making $60,000 a year don't need government oblige to buy insurance for their kids.
I read an article on CNN's website about this issue. Bush needs to carry his priorities straight, he went wrong in the period of war, cause he is power hungry and its getting to his head. He is dismissing every other issue that wishes some attention too, though the War is very important but as a nation we want to bring other issues to the light. What bush does war prudent we can't do jack **** about it. Just hope and pray all the troops come home undamagingly and come home soon. I think bush should pass this bill, even though he said he is going to veto it. I saw Micheal Moore's movie on the U.S. Healthcare call "Sicko" its an awesome movie, I highly recommend it. I believe though like within Europe and such that we pay more taxes to have free strength care. I am willing to payment more taxes to get free health safekeeping, even though I don't make a lot of money. Then, immature children can get all the medical protection they need and for free! Also, when I was reading the article on CNN something like bush going to veto the bill, they said the funding for it would be from raising the ciggarette tax....I found that really strange. Lets relief provide health care for kids.....oh and to fund it let raise ciggarette taxes BRILLIANT! NOT!! Everyone always tell us Ciggarettes are bad and can kill, so the governent, should angle tax on a killing way, and use the money to help kids, it just seem weird how that works, I am all roughly speaking helping the kids get health keeping but just the way to gain it funded is bizzare. Take Care!
~Christine :)
hopefully yes
Here is Some Real "Health Insurance" Work, which the BushAdministration SUPPORTS. !! Only Problem is that It MAKES ME SICK, as Well it Should You. !! http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/116.htm…
Is bushbabies from teh AffrikanZ?


Related Questions:
I don't hold robustness insurance and I hold A examine: Where can I walk to Have A Pregnancy blood examination done?   Does anybody know how much it would cost for me to seize tested for heart arrythmia in need condition insurance?   Would you support have your taxes increase by $15 respectively year if it would provide strength insurance?   Can I claim my parents as dependents for robustness insurance and duty purposes?   What's the age inhibit  you can be on your parents form insurance?