Isn't it hopeless that most smokers hold no condition insurance?
And they often put their health nurture costs on the rest of us for conditions they gave themselves.
Answers:
How much does someone spend on cigarettes these days? Think if they of late didn't smoke and used that money to purchase healthcare. They'll probably blame someone else for them smoking. It's never their fault.
I hold to strongly disagree with your theory in need seeing proof...
Most people who smoke have job, many of those jobs come beside benefits, and most smokers are older and have insurance...they even clear more for it.
the_libe, umm group rates do make it cheaper. Does anyone in your own flesh and blood have cancer? Do you have any kids? All of those things are cheaper to insure by means of access of group rates. Otherwise it would be enormously more expensive to insure the most expensive group out there...children.
Our PresElect be a smoker. You sayin he aint got no inshoance?
fk smokers. sick bastards. tehy don't bequeath a fk about you or me. they smoke in your obverse. anywhere and everywhere outside and inside.
fking themselves up just as much as they fk you up.
they don't need vigour insurance. they know what they are doing and smoke packages don't need warning label. it would take a idiot to not know the effects of smoking.
go ahead. ask a smoker why they smoke. they will make a contribution you the dumbest msot uneducated answer.
I'm stressed. killing yourself seem to be stressful if you ask me.
its ppl like smokers who make America a doomed to failure place to live.
not to mention we have something called CHEM-TRAILS within the air above us. no bs, that has barium and aluminium and is slowly providing humans from across the sphere with wondrous things like cancer, chest pains, and grassland attacks.
You're carry attack no matter what.
Since all the information regarding health and smoking are nearby. I'll just sit back and permit nature works its course. For a perfectly strong smoker, I say "good for you." For those who are not so lucky, I speak "experience is the hardest teacher."
I suppose some populace could say that an addiction is a disease like any other, and that we shouldn't condemn them for one mistake they made within their lives. Which I might agree with if it didn't usually end up turning into something that affects not individual their entire lives, but every other person who they've blown second-hand smoke on, every street they've littered next to butts, and everyone they've taken tax dollars from to pay for emergency room visit because they're coughing up blood from the cancerous lesion in their lung.
Who says "most smokers have no vigour insurance"?
Don
http://mtnhealthinsurance.com
if the feds made tobacco illegitimate like pot think of how much they would own to increase taxes to cover for it.
i think more people should smoke they rate more taxes than i do. i like smokers.
i hang out surrounded by a bar and the funniest thing is that the biggest complainers of smoke are the exsmokers
Do you have a source for that statistic, or is that lately your "impression" of the world?
Regardless, that's not how insurance works either. People without insurance own zero impact on your insurance costs. You only pool the risk near other people who ARE covered.
But way to give somebody a lift someone else's lung cancer, and make it about you.
possess as much information as you could maybe is one of the option,however it is quite time consuming,here http://www.HealthInsuranceIdeas.info/free-online-health-insurance.htm is the resource i have ever have good experience.
Do ya have anything intelligent to articulate?
I have smoked all my duration, I'm 61 years old, never been contained by a hospital, go to the doctor once a year and I am healthier next most people my age.
Next stupid question........ Source(s): Btw, you should be thank smokers for paying so much in taxes. I know, I know, that part doesn't count, right?
Do you have any statistical facts that smokers don't hold insurance?
You may be a smoker even thought you don't know it! It's adjectives to everyone from the smoke blowing out of your a-s-s! What a stupid assumption to make.
People who smoke have to money the exorbitant prices and taxes on their habit. Ergo, they must be gainfully employed at a employment that pays them sufficient income to be able to blow part of it up within smoke, eh? Seems likely to me that they would be eligible for any health insurance offered by their employer or know how to afford their own IF they want it.
If you are a liberal democrat, why are you complaining about smokers? You just elected a brain-dead socialist who will attempt to put the entire country on government-paid strength care. Are you saying that underneath "your government", smokers would not be eligible for the same care given to everyone else?
If you are a conservative, want you be reminded that smokers make their own choices to use tobacco and it IS still legal, and not forbidden by "Big Bro Health Care System". Source(s): Ex-smoker
I'd like to know where you get your info on this one. Who ever gave it to you should be fired!
The FARCE is called "group rates" for Insurance....and for some reason, inhabitants THINK it's a great way to control costs. HA!
If I do "risky" things (sky dive, scuba, BASE jump).... I lose my "right" to get duration insurance. Doesn't it make sense that a person who smokes NOT win health insurance?
WELL....
By combining EVERYONE together... "we" all wage more than we normally would, so the "plan" will cover those who are unhealthy and do unwell things.
"Group rates" are a CROCK. If you shopped for insurance on your own, you could do better, but the "scam artists" have convinced you that "group rates" get some style of "discount" because there are "so many customers".
Not entirely true.....
IT WAS EXACTLY THIS KIND OF BS LOGIC THAT TOOK JARTS OFF THE MARKET!
I dont think its doleful.
Related Questions:
Answers:
How much does someone spend on cigarettes these days? Think if they of late didn't smoke and used that money to purchase healthcare. They'll probably blame someone else for them smoking. It's never their fault.
I hold to strongly disagree with your theory in need seeing proof...
Most people who smoke have job, many of those jobs come beside benefits, and most smokers are older and have insurance...they even clear more for it.
the_libe, umm group rates do make it cheaper. Does anyone in your own flesh and blood have cancer? Do you have any kids? All of those things are cheaper to insure by means of access of group rates. Otherwise it would be enormously more expensive to insure the most expensive group out there...children.
Our PresElect be a smoker. You sayin he aint got no inshoance?
fk smokers. sick bastards. tehy don't bequeath a fk about you or me. they smoke in your obverse. anywhere and everywhere outside and inside.
fking themselves up just as much as they fk you up.
they don't need vigour insurance. they know what they are doing and smoke packages don't need warning label. it would take a idiot to not know the effects of smoking.
go ahead. ask a smoker why they smoke. they will make a contribution you the dumbest msot uneducated answer.
I'm stressed. killing yourself seem to be stressful if you ask me.
its ppl like smokers who make America a doomed to failure place to live.
not to mention we have something called CHEM-TRAILS within the air above us. no bs, that has barium and aluminium and is slowly providing humans from across the sphere with wondrous things like cancer, chest pains, and grassland attacks.
You're carry attack no matter what.
Since all the information regarding health and smoking are nearby. I'll just sit back and permit nature works its course. For a perfectly strong smoker, I say "good for you." For those who are not so lucky, I speak "experience is the hardest teacher."
I suppose some populace could say that an addiction is a disease like any other, and that we shouldn't condemn them for one mistake they made within their lives. Which I might agree with if it didn't usually end up turning into something that affects not individual their entire lives, but every other person who they've blown second-hand smoke on, every street they've littered next to butts, and everyone they've taken tax dollars from to pay for emergency room visit because they're coughing up blood from the cancerous lesion in their lung.
Who says "most smokers have no vigour insurance"?
Don
http://mtnhealthinsurance.com
if the feds made tobacco illegitimate like pot think of how much they would own to increase taxes to cover for it.
i think more people should smoke they rate more taxes than i do. i like smokers.
i hang out surrounded by a bar and the funniest thing is that the biggest complainers of smoke are the exsmokers
Do you have a source for that statistic, or is that lately your "impression" of the world?
Regardless, that's not how insurance works either. People without insurance own zero impact on your insurance costs. You only pool the risk near other people who ARE covered.
But way to give somebody a lift someone else's lung cancer, and make it about you.
possess as much information as you could maybe is one of the option,however it is quite time consuming,here http://www.HealthInsuranceIdeas.info/free-online-health-insurance.htm is the resource i have ever have good experience.
Do ya have anything intelligent to articulate?
I have smoked all my duration, I'm 61 years old, never been contained by a hospital, go to the doctor once a year and I am healthier next most people my age.
Next stupid question........ Source(s): Btw, you should be thank smokers for paying so much in taxes. I know, I know, that part doesn't count, right?
Do you have any statistical facts that smokers don't hold insurance?
You may be a smoker even thought you don't know it! It's adjectives to everyone from the smoke blowing out of your a-s-s! What a stupid assumption to make.
People who smoke have to money the exorbitant prices and taxes on their habit. Ergo, they must be gainfully employed at a employment that pays them sufficient income to be able to blow part of it up within smoke, eh? Seems likely to me that they would be eligible for any health insurance offered by their employer or know how to afford their own IF they want it.
If you are a liberal democrat, why are you complaining about smokers? You just elected a brain-dead socialist who will attempt to put the entire country on government-paid strength care. Are you saying that underneath "your government", smokers would not be eligible for the same care given to everyone else?
If you are a conservative, want you be reminded that smokers make their own choices to use tobacco and it IS still legal, and not forbidden by "Big Bro Health Care System". Source(s): Ex-smoker
I'd like to know where you get your info on this one. Who ever gave it to you should be fired!
The FARCE is called "group rates" for Insurance....and for some reason, inhabitants THINK it's a great way to control costs. HA!
If I do "risky" things (sky dive, scuba, BASE jump).... I lose my "right" to get duration insurance. Doesn't it make sense that a person who smokes NOT win health insurance?
WELL....
By combining EVERYONE together... "we" all wage more than we normally would, so the "plan" will cover those who are unhealthy and do unwell things.
"Group rates" are a CROCK. If you shopped for insurance on your own, you could do better, but the "scam artists" have convinced you that "group rates" get some style of "discount" because there are "so many customers".
Not entirely true.....
IT WAS EXACTLY THIS KIND OF BS LOGIC THAT TOOK JARTS OFF THE MARKET!
I dont think its doleful.
Related Questions:
- What is a suitable form insurance policy for me and my husband?
- How would "public option" elected representatives robustness insurance compete "fairly" next to private strength insurers?
- What exactly is socialized form insurance?
- Where can I grasp a work piece time (in school) and still be capable of get hold of vigour insurance?
- Can someone explain a condition insurance "deductible" contained by lay vocabulary?