Do labor union leaders catch kickback when they force their member to switch robustness insurance providers?

I'm a union member and my coalition recently signed a new contract next to my employer. My employer had been offering three different robustness insurance providers. My Union's new Business Manager decided during dialogue with the company that he wanted to cover everyone beside their union administered health insurance plan. I find it severely suspicious that my union leadership would try to bear away our options since all the vigour plans were comparable in price and coverage. Do you conjecture the Business Manager got something in return?
It is optimistic to think any of our leaders (government or union) don't take kickback and look out for themselves. Power and corruption go hand contained by hand.
Probably. Unions are (in my opinion) corrupt and unnecesary.
"> Unions grasp kickbacks for everything. There's rules for gifts to politicians, there's no rules for "gifts" for union leaders, reps, or bosses.
Probably. 99% of all union are crooked someway, somehow.


Related Questions:
What to do nearly a urinary tract infection and no form insurance?   Where can I sign up for only 1 week of form insurance?   Health insurance from work?   I requirement vigour insurance surrounded by Phoenix what option are out within?   How come proletarian human resources don't qualify for employer's group form insurance plans?