What type of permissible precedent will be set if mandate robustness insurance be upheld by the supreme court?
Answers: Actually, none. It would FOLLOW a bad precedent that has already be set. That said, it IS outside the authority granted by the Constitution to the Federal Government.
You can't buy a home in need homeowners insurance. You can't drive a car without auto insurance. Every mound account is insured by the FDIC. It only make sense that people have robustness insurance.
A very bad one.
If they can mandate that they can mandate purchase of ANYTHING their politically connected friends are selling.
The constitution is meaningless. Who am I kidding, it already is!
Related Questions:
- Can you hold full form insurance and still hold medical bills to reward?
- I requirement relieve surrounded by choosing a condition insurance provider. Can someone serve me sift through adjectives the possible privat?
- Is it commonplace for a time attention provider to want a copy of my vigour insurance card?
- Who did Lazarus enjoy private robustness insurance next to ?
- Does anyone know of any form insurance that have right coverage and not thoroughly expensive?
