Why do liberals be aware of simply because a being be LUCKY plenty to be born here, they should carry "FREE" insurance?
well ,not FREE considering it will come out of US HARD WORKING FOLKS paycheck. I am NOT PAYING FOR YOUR LAZY BUTT!
Answers:
ok, rant reported. Source(s): im a guy
Yes we are LUCKY!
But it seem like you've never had an complaint that your health insurance wouldn't cover... or had to take-home pay $100 a month for one prescription that your insurance couldn't pay... or had a lapse of insurance due to anyone laid off. You've been LUCKY!
Insurance wouldn't be mandatory, it would be available. It would be a choice for those who enjoy none. It would most benefit the working poor who are too broke to pay high premiums but not poor satisfactory for Medicaid.
Those people aren't lazy, most work two/three job, and would rather put food on their table than pay $500/month for insurance because their employer does not donate it.
I'm sorry you are such an angry person.
oh but you are paying for it...Why do you think its so giant..cause everyone gets treated anyways and we reward the tab. Everyone admits its out of control so what would you do.
It is possible to redraw the line that define inalienable rights. Ina country with our wealth and benevolence it seems cray that everyone does not have access to healthcare. Health. Care. You are taken perfectionism of when you are sick. This is basic and the fact that it is not surrounded by this country is just immoral. Caring for the sick is at the center of Christianity.
Well I suppose you are against the taxes you pay person used for the fire department, the police department, road construction and repair. Your house starts on fire and MY tax money go towards saving you and your property? Why wasn't your lazy butt out within putting out the fire? Why the hell should my tax money benefit you? What's that you say, you take-home pay taxes also so you're entitled to the protection of the police and fire? Well if you do any reading at all about the proposals for a national robustness care plan you'll find it is being considered along like lines. Namely everyone pays for the benefit of the few as they need the help. It is a principal used over and over again within modern society and in countless civic and public duties. There will be mandates forcing you to use a national form care plan.
Something tell me that you are not nearly as hard working as you say you are. That said, you are apying more presently for the health care of the uninsured than you would beneath any kind of universal plan. That is why form insurance and health care costs verbs to rise in the U.S.
it's the Party of bad accepted wisdom that sound so nice.
Another great sounding bill is the Windfall profit tax. Everyone seem that sounds great. Here are a few facts:
They calculate that 41 percent of oil company stocks are owned by allowance plans and individuals' retirement accounts. Hence much of the tax's burden would have fallen on current and adjectives retirees, reducing both the market value of, and dividends remunerated by, those stocks. The cost to all the oil companies' shareholders, contained by forgone stock appreciation and dividends, would have ranged -- depending on grease prices and inflation -- from $21.3 billion to $121.8 billion per year. Shapiro and Pham also conclude that the windfall profits tax would own discouraged domestic oil production and increased U.S. dependence on imports from the Persian Gulf. And from Venezuela, thereby funding the left-wing fascism of Hugo Chavez.
Yes, someone else be way ahead of you.
"If they are to die, then tolerate them die, and decrease the surplus population." E. Scrooge.
The majority of the time it is the employer that doesn't reimburse the person's insurance. For example, McDonald's can hire 95% of it's employees as part--time and not have to wage a single health insurance plan. It really isn't always the "lazy" relations that have to live without insurance.
Yeah, but then the subsequent step will be to provide FREE insurance to persons who WEREN'T born here and didn't bother to become citizens.
Everyone in the US can carry "free" health care. As grandmaster-Bush have told us, "they can go to the emergency room". And we all payment for that too.
So I don't understand your rant.
Because they are in favor of entitlements. Actually, they want everyone to have free robustness care - illegals included! There is no way I can defend that argument.
I hope you never get an sickness that your insurance company denies treatment on.
Related Questions:
No strength insurance make happen I'm 17, so free clinic or what?
Does virginia enjoy free insurance for pregnant woman?
Free sim no charge? phone insurance? AT&T cingular?
Which motor insurance company surrounded by the UK offer the 7 light of day free insurance?
Is within such entity as free insurance?
Answers:
ok, rant reported. Source(s): im a guy
Yes we are LUCKY!
But it seem like you've never had an complaint that your health insurance wouldn't cover... or had to take-home pay $100 a month for one prescription that your insurance couldn't pay... or had a lapse of insurance due to anyone laid off. You've been LUCKY!
Insurance wouldn't be mandatory, it would be available. It would be a choice for those who enjoy none. It would most benefit the working poor who are too broke to pay high premiums but not poor satisfactory for Medicaid.
Those people aren't lazy, most work two/three job, and would rather put food on their table than pay $500/month for insurance because their employer does not donate it.
I'm sorry you are such an angry person.
oh but you are paying for it...Why do you think its so giant..cause everyone gets treated anyways and we reward the tab. Everyone admits its out of control so what would you do.
It is possible to redraw the line that define inalienable rights. Ina country with our wealth and benevolence it seems cray that everyone does not have access to healthcare. Health. Care. You are taken perfectionism of when you are sick. This is basic and the fact that it is not surrounded by this country is just immoral. Caring for the sick is at the center of Christianity.
Well I suppose you are against the taxes you pay person used for the fire department, the police department, road construction and repair. Your house starts on fire and MY tax money go towards saving you and your property? Why wasn't your lazy butt out within putting out the fire? Why the hell should my tax money benefit you? What's that you say, you take-home pay taxes also so you're entitled to the protection of the police and fire? Well if you do any reading at all about the proposals for a national robustness care plan you'll find it is being considered along like lines. Namely everyone pays for the benefit of the few as they need the help. It is a principal used over and over again within modern society and in countless civic and public duties. There will be mandates forcing you to use a national form care plan.
Something tell me that you are not nearly as hard working as you say you are. That said, you are apying more presently for the health care of the uninsured than you would beneath any kind of universal plan. That is why form insurance and health care costs verbs to rise in the U.S.
it's the Party of bad accepted wisdom that sound so nice.
Another great sounding bill is the Windfall profit tax. Everyone seem that sounds great. Here are a few facts:
They calculate that 41 percent of oil company stocks are owned by allowance plans and individuals' retirement accounts. Hence much of the tax's burden would have fallen on current and adjectives retirees, reducing both the market value of, and dividends remunerated by, those stocks. The cost to all the oil companies' shareholders, contained by forgone stock appreciation and dividends, would have ranged -- depending on grease prices and inflation -- from $21.3 billion to $121.8 billion per year. Shapiro and Pham also conclude that the windfall profits tax would own discouraged domestic oil production and increased U.S. dependence on imports from the Persian Gulf. And from Venezuela, thereby funding the left-wing fascism of Hugo Chavez.
Yes, someone else be way ahead of you.
"If they are to die, then tolerate them die, and decrease the surplus population." E. Scrooge.
The majority of the time it is the employer that doesn't reimburse the person's insurance. For example, McDonald's can hire 95% of it's employees as part--time and not have to wage a single health insurance plan. It really isn't always the "lazy" relations that have to live without insurance.
Yeah, but then the subsequent step will be to provide FREE insurance to persons who WEREN'T born here and didn't bother to become citizens.
Everyone in the US can carry "free" health care. As grandmaster-Bush have told us, "they can go to the emergency room". And we all payment for that too.
So I don't understand your rant.
Because they are in favor of entitlements. Actually, they want everyone to have free robustness care - illegals included! There is no way I can defend that argument.
I hope you never get an sickness that your insurance company denies treatment on.
Related Questions: