Socialized healthcare or free open market insurance?
What is your opinion? Please include where you live and the current system in attendance.
Answers:
Socialised healthcare, which we have contained by the UK. It's in the interests of the government to own a healthy, fighting fit reserve army for workforce or war. Also, insurance companies are in it for the money, whereas government have a vested interest in providing fitting care as it gets them re-elected. Thirdly, private healthcare is other more costly than socialised healthcare due to the reduced numbers of people paying into the system. Therefore it is in everyone's benefits, even the really rich and healthy, to have a in good health operating socialised health care system, to some extent than private insurance.
Until the AMA's stranglehold on the healthcare institution within America is broken there will be no "free market" anything. Before you can have a better anything you hold to open it up to competition. That's the last item the AMA wants. We need more medical students graduate so we can have more doctors, more clinics, more hospitals and more choice. After that you must make funding of medical school a public (tax payer) responsibility. Pharmaceutical companies now pay the bills of these medical school and by doing so literally own them. Doctors are basically drug pushers by the time they graduate. And we even have a deeper problem than the above. Three things must start for health to become a part of the American folks: 1) graduate more doctors, 2) eliminate private funding for medical schools, and 3) revolutionize the quality of our environment. And by that I mean, more natural foods, less anti-biotics, growth hormones, herbicides/pesticides in our food, cleaner air/water and more nutritient-rich farmland.
Socialized health care is a much better system. It save money, and lives, since it deals with preemptive strength care rather than waiting for the forgiving to be in critical condition.
Live in: Canada.
Wait hours at a hospital: depends on the severity of your emergency. Most of the time I've have to wait a max of 6 hours. The average wait time is around 4 hours.
I couldn't picture having to go out of business so that the hospital could not take my house away for unpaid bills.
I couldn't imagine living surrounded by a system where Id have to encounter with a random insurance company to bring back them to pay my bill.
This question have been debated to the loss already. Look at the stats: the US has a higher rate of infant mortality, and inhabitants from socialized countries usually tend to live longer and have healthier lives. Period. No alarm tactics put out by the insurance companies could refute these statistics. Source(s): mgold: i notably doubt you are canadian. i have had countless friends and loved ones members that had to progress to the emergency room and not one waited over 5 hours. you don't allow people to email you, so answer my cross-question on here: what problem did you go in the emergency room for and have to wait over 18 hours?
93% of canadians wouldnt change our vigour care system for the american one. fact.
Socialized, conspicuously, I live in New Zealand [ we have a 'mix' of both ], invariably for accident/ emergency or crucial high-cost treatment/ surgery the public hospitals win hands down as they have the high-tech equipment. Insured relations sometimes end up in public hospital, which system they have wasted money ! Free bazaar insurance doesn't help the poor or chronically sick who can't afford the premiums. Glad to see at least one American [ it's that guy ] , who realize that socialism and social conscience has some place even in the home of capitalism !! Well done, 'guy' !
I live in California and we enjoy free market insurance.
The problem with it is the hospitals are required to treat family anyway, even if they are never able to pay.
The result of the problem is that hospitals adjectives over California are having to close, expecially in the Los Angeles nouns, due to treating so many people that are unqualified to pay.
If people have insurance, they could go to the doctor's office for treatment and preventative treatment, and not own to go to the hospital to see a doctor for free.
By the way, none of the proposed plans I enjoy seen are based on the plan surrounded by Canada, but have rather made adjustment for the problems inherent in the Canadian system.
Free market insurance might not be a bad conception if it really -was- a free market. The way we do it surrounded by the US, we have an oligopoly of four or five enormous insurance companies that own Congress. There is no solid competition, and all the laws are set up to allow these companies to control the entire industry--in reality the insurance companies own all the hospitals and clinics, and the doctors work for them.
EVERY other developed country has some form of government-run insurance. I approaching the Canadian system best, as do large majorities of Americans whenever there's a poll. Under that system, hospitals, clinics and doctors remain private and competitive (a TRUE free market!) while the administration handles the health insurance. Everyone is contained by the same insurance pool and private insurance companies don't have an incentive to cherry-pick solely healthy people to insure and rebuff everyone else. As a result, Canadians pay less than partly what we do for health care, and they obtain care that is as right or better, based on outcomes or customer satisfaction.
'Socialized' healthcare is one of those brightly-colored political jargon that is usually misused. Socialized medicine vehicle that the govt. operates the hospitals and health services, as beside Britain's National Health Service. In the US, of course, 'socialism' is a bad word, and its used for ANY organization involvement. But we have socialized police and fire protection and most of us can't imagine those services self provided any other way!
Free Market Insurance, such is what I would prefer
Place of Residence: Canada
Health Care system: Socialized
Avergae skulk time in hospital waiting room: 18-36 hours
Need I say more?
Socialized healthcare is the best. I live in the US where on earth the worst healthcare pricing in the civilized world.
Socialized prescription. I DON'T liek it. But here --in the USA--weh have the "free market" option. And it sucks. Our vigour care system--once a public/private partnership tha twas the est in the world--and the most cost effective--is very soon at the bottom among industrialized countries--and the most expensive in the world.
How bad is it? Well--socialized tablets is a bureaucratic mess--inefficient and expensive. Yet even that is beating what we hold in the US today.
I don't want either--I want us to reform our existing system to return to the liberal of system we had before it get commercialized and became a cash cow for big corporations. But if I hold to choose between what we have and socilaized medicine-I'll take socialized pills.
Free market all the mode.
Central TX USA - Free Market
Related Questions:
Answers:
Socialised healthcare, which we have contained by the UK. It's in the interests of the government to own a healthy, fighting fit reserve army for workforce or war. Also, insurance companies are in it for the money, whereas government have a vested interest in providing fitting care as it gets them re-elected. Thirdly, private healthcare is other more costly than socialised healthcare due to the reduced numbers of people paying into the system. Therefore it is in everyone's benefits, even the really rich and healthy, to have a in good health operating socialised health care system, to some extent than private insurance.
Until the AMA's stranglehold on the healthcare institution within America is broken there will be no "free market" anything. Before you can have a better anything you hold to open it up to competition. That's the last item the AMA wants. We need more medical students graduate so we can have more doctors, more clinics, more hospitals and more choice. After that you must make funding of medical school a public (tax payer) responsibility. Pharmaceutical companies now pay the bills of these medical school and by doing so literally own them. Doctors are basically drug pushers by the time they graduate. And we even have a deeper problem than the above. Three things must start for health to become a part of the American folks: 1) graduate more doctors, 2) eliminate private funding for medical schools, and 3) revolutionize the quality of our environment. And by that I mean, more natural foods, less anti-biotics, growth hormones, herbicides/pesticides in our food, cleaner air/water and more nutritient-rich farmland.
Socialized health care is a much better system. It save money, and lives, since it deals with preemptive strength care rather than waiting for the forgiving to be in critical condition.
Live in: Canada.
Wait hours at a hospital: depends on the severity of your emergency. Most of the time I've have to wait a max of 6 hours. The average wait time is around 4 hours.
I couldn't picture having to go out of business so that the hospital could not take my house away for unpaid bills.
I couldn't imagine living surrounded by a system where Id have to encounter with a random insurance company to bring back them to pay my bill.
This question have been debated to the loss already. Look at the stats: the US has a higher rate of infant mortality, and inhabitants from socialized countries usually tend to live longer and have healthier lives. Period. No alarm tactics put out by the insurance companies could refute these statistics. Source(s): mgold: i notably doubt you are canadian. i have had countless friends and loved ones members that had to progress to the emergency room and not one waited over 5 hours. you don't allow people to email you, so answer my cross-question on here: what problem did you go in the emergency room for and have to wait over 18 hours?
93% of canadians wouldnt change our vigour care system for the american one. fact.
Socialized, conspicuously, I live in New Zealand [ we have a 'mix' of both ], invariably for accident/ emergency or crucial high-cost treatment/ surgery the public hospitals win hands down as they have the high-tech equipment. Insured relations sometimes end up in public hospital, which system they have wasted money ! Free bazaar insurance doesn't help the poor or chronically sick who can't afford the premiums. Glad to see at least one American [ it's that guy ] , who realize that socialism and social conscience has some place even in the home of capitalism !! Well done, 'guy' !
I live in California and we enjoy free market insurance.
The problem with it is the hospitals are required to treat family anyway, even if they are never able to pay.
The result of the problem is that hospitals adjectives over California are having to close, expecially in the Los Angeles nouns, due to treating so many people that are unqualified to pay.
If people have insurance, they could go to the doctor's office for treatment and preventative treatment, and not own to go to the hospital to see a doctor for free.
By the way, none of the proposed plans I enjoy seen are based on the plan surrounded by Canada, but have rather made adjustment for the problems inherent in the Canadian system.
Free market insurance might not be a bad conception if it really -was- a free market. The way we do it surrounded by the US, we have an oligopoly of four or five enormous insurance companies that own Congress. There is no solid competition, and all the laws are set up to allow these companies to control the entire industry--in reality the insurance companies own all the hospitals and clinics, and the doctors work for them.
EVERY other developed country has some form of government-run insurance. I approaching the Canadian system best, as do large majorities of Americans whenever there's a poll. Under that system, hospitals, clinics and doctors remain private and competitive (a TRUE free market!) while the administration handles the health insurance. Everyone is contained by the same insurance pool and private insurance companies don't have an incentive to cherry-pick solely healthy people to insure and rebuff everyone else. As a result, Canadians pay less than partly what we do for health care, and they obtain care that is as right or better, based on outcomes or customer satisfaction.
'Socialized' healthcare is one of those brightly-colored political jargon that is usually misused. Socialized medicine vehicle that the govt. operates the hospitals and health services, as beside Britain's National Health Service. In the US, of course, 'socialism' is a bad word, and its used for ANY organization involvement. But we have socialized police and fire protection and most of us can't imagine those services self provided any other way!
Free Market Insurance, such is what I would prefer
Place of Residence: Canada
Health Care system: Socialized
Avergae skulk time in hospital waiting room: 18-36 hours
Need I say more?
Socialized healthcare is the best. I live in the US where on earth the worst healthcare pricing in the civilized world.
Socialized prescription. I DON'T liek it. But here --in the USA--weh have the "free market" option. And it sucks. Our vigour care system--once a public/private partnership tha twas the est in the world--and the most cost effective--is very soon at the bottom among industrialized countries--and the most expensive in the world.
How bad is it? Well--socialized tablets is a bureaucratic mess--inefficient and expensive. Yet even that is beating what we hold in the US today.
I don't want either--I want us to reform our existing system to return to the liberal of system we had before it get commercialized and became a cash cow for big corporations. But if I hold to choose between what we have and socilaized medicine-I'll take socialized pills.
Free market all the mode.
Central TX USA - Free Market
Related Questions:
- I'm 29, can I procure medicare or some description of free insurance?
- When did liberals wish that "promote the common welfare" should include free medical insurance?
- I own natural life insurance for 50,000 dollars that my employer give me for free, is this a moral amount?
- Can you receive free psychiatric therapy beside insurance?
- Life insurance policy just now hyped for seniors 75 - 85 near 1st 2 yrs premium free.?