What do you guys estimate going on for free equal vigour insurance for everyone surrounded by the United States?
In the film sicko by Michael Moore free health insurance its discussed and i believe we should do what Canada, France, London and masses other countries have do and give everyone free condition insurance. It seems like the right ruminate to do and i was very shocked when i watch the movie, when doctors had to make choices of not operating some one because he have no money and he died because of this. This is very unethical and i suppose something should really be done about this , in the countries that i mentioned that would never crop up .I believe its very wrong to deny some one an operation because of no money , that’s denying the right to life.
Answers:
I haven’t seen the film, but even if I have, I wouldn’t base an opinion solely on a documentary minus researching its accuracy (I not saying it’s accurate or vague, because I don’t know).
Personally, I don’t particularly want the government managing my condition care, because they are horrible managers.
You said: “give everyone free form insurance”
It’s NOT free. Someone will have to pay for it and that someone is the taxpayers, and as usual it will be the middle-class that get hit the hardest with this raise within taxes that will result. My taxes are already so high I can barely craft ends meet each month, and however, I *scrape* money together to pay for health insurance because I realize that it’s not anyone’s responsibility to discharge for my healthcare. Just like it shouldn’t be my responsibility to pay for other people’s healthcare. Harsh? Maybe. But the taxpayers are getting nurture up with the ‘you owe me/I have a right to’ attitude that too heaps people have. So here's a suggestion--people stipulation to get an education so they can catch a job that pays them enough money that they afford to purchase strength insurance.
And in the US no one is denied emergency strength care. Even if you can’t afford to pay, the hospital will treat you. Of course, somebody have to pay for it in the finishing.
I was born and raise in Europe and half of my relatives live within the UK. I thus know that Michael Moore's movie sicko is very deceiving. I would rather be sick within the USA. When I travel to Europe I make sure that I buy special insurance that includes repatriation to the USA.
The arguement is who pays, and who controls the decision.
Instead of working half a year to pay taxes for benefits I dont receive. I would much fairly keep my own money, and buy my own insurance.
People can press their local governments to do something as okay. There are some cities that offer insurance to low income & self employeed individuals at a group rate (cheaper than single party)
The problems addressed contained by sicko dealt with relatives who DID have insurance, who were denied coverage.
Our current insurance system places the monitary priority to the share holders & maintain profits, and NOT to the insured.
Its simple.. Insurance companies should actually insure their patients. They should give the benefits they promise to the patients, in need the need for patients to file endorsed action to get the coverage they rewarded for.
Having nationalized medicine in a capitalist socieity is not a upright mix imo. We would be giving more tax dollars into the hands of private businesses whose primary hope is to make a profit.
I do not see the government limiting the profits of those companies.
Start asking yourself why the medication is so much cheaper within those other countries? Its because the pharm companies can charge the insurance companies so much. So they do. Its because the FDA has limited our choices when it comes to over the counter & prescription drugs, giving particular companies monopolies over certain types of drugs. The FDA also restricting and invalidating the benefits of holistic medicines & innate remedies, forcing us to rely on the medical industrial complex to solve our problems.
Some natural remedies (such as weed for some ailments) are illegeal, forcing us to rely on higher priced prescriptions.
Check out Ron Pauls page where on earth he talks about heathcare. With so various years as a physician, he knows first hand the problems doctors own with the insuance companies. Source(s): RonPaul2008.com
I totally agree.
I am not familiar near health care anywhere but Canada and the U.S.A. But base on that, I feel Canada is doing a better job adjectives around.
Don't forget Michael Moore's "documents" are exagerated and sometimes to the extreme.
But, I do believe universal health attention would greatly benefit our country in the long run. The problem, how much it'll cost the government to gain it up and running.
My solution, stop the funds towards the war and use it for the program and our education system.
there are 3 solutions: socialized medicine, free flea market healthcare, or the corporate system we have now.
socialism may nouns like the best choice, but i assure u it is not. the free market system would work cheaper and more effectively beside everyone if they'd remove some governmental regulations.
also, when u give the system to the government, the establishment gets to decide which treatments work for you, and which won't. this should be a finding between patients and doctors. Source(s): Ron Paul on Health Care (some clips from sicko): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=287IQ_7Qj…
No such thing as free. Someone pays for it, whether it is the sick personage, insurance company, taxpayer, healthcare provider, etc. Doctors in other countries do the exact same thing. There isn't adequate money for everyone to have every procedure....in Canada, France, Japan, etc., culture still die waiting for an available procedure.
That is not denying a right to life. Hospitals don't go around shooting or stabbing inhabitants. You are just as 'responsible' for not paying for their procedure as anybody else.
I agree that Moore is deceiving in his doco - I lived adjectives my life in Canada and, while you don't enjoy to pay for health trouble, you certainly get what you clear for! The waiting times are so ridiculous, people often stir across the border and pay for things like MRI's and cat-scans because otherwise they'd be waiting for a year. A YEAR! Can you picture blowing out your knee and having to dawdle a year to get an MRI to see what's wrong. Then, you'll need to capture on a waiting list to see a specialist, then a surgeon, afterwards get on the surgery waiting list. By after, you'll be retired so I guess it won't matter so much! If it's not life-threatening, you're screwed. If it is life-threatening, you're double screwed. It sucks! I'd rather rate if given the choice.
I expect it's a good idea, but it's probably too sturdy to implement in the USA.
Also -- London isn't a country.
It would be a exceedingly good thing unsurprisingly and help many nation, but our country is in so much debt right now I doubt it would ensue. It would just dig our country into a deeper hole and is not a top priority, especially near the wars going on.
I'm not saying that I don't agree near your no money no operatoin policy is wrong, because I do. I just think its not something that will be scheduled anytime soon.
Nothing is free. Taxes would go up to pay for it. I prefer making my own decision about my health. We can adjectives see how well government agencies work here. Just look at the VA or any other affairs of state agency.
Canada,France and London have the right idea.I agree
lol...I see you watched sicko, I am canadian living in US and I expect it's better to be here and have my husbands insurance. otherwise if you are on hmo you are nothing different from those countries.
I agree next to Moore he has a point. but tell me something what's stopping you guys from going to one of those countries?? no situation what happens with vigour everyone cares about money, and surrounded by that US currency rocks! and that's what keeps everyone from talking going on for health insurance.
i dont know what i am talking more or less i got so much to say ,but it's this request for information requires an essay answer.....dont have time for that
Related Questions:
Answers:
I haven’t seen the film, but even if I have, I wouldn’t base an opinion solely on a documentary minus researching its accuracy (I not saying it’s accurate or vague, because I don’t know).
Personally, I don’t particularly want the government managing my condition care, because they are horrible managers.
You said: “give everyone free form insurance”
It’s NOT free. Someone will have to pay for it and that someone is the taxpayers, and as usual it will be the middle-class that get hit the hardest with this raise within taxes that will result. My taxes are already so high I can barely craft ends meet each month, and however, I *scrape* money together to pay for health insurance because I realize that it’s not anyone’s responsibility to discharge for my healthcare. Just like it shouldn’t be my responsibility to pay for other people’s healthcare. Harsh? Maybe. But the taxpayers are getting nurture up with the ‘you owe me/I have a right to’ attitude that too heaps people have. So here's a suggestion--people stipulation to get an education so they can catch a job that pays them enough money that they afford to purchase strength insurance.
And in the US no one is denied emergency strength care. Even if you can’t afford to pay, the hospital will treat you. Of course, somebody have to pay for it in the finishing.
I was born and raise in Europe and half of my relatives live within the UK. I thus know that Michael Moore's movie sicko is very deceiving. I would rather be sick within the USA. When I travel to Europe I make sure that I buy special insurance that includes repatriation to the USA.
The arguement is who pays, and who controls the decision.
Instead of working half a year to pay taxes for benefits I dont receive. I would much fairly keep my own money, and buy my own insurance.
People can press their local governments to do something as okay. There are some cities that offer insurance to low income & self employeed individuals at a group rate (cheaper than single party)
The problems addressed contained by sicko dealt with relatives who DID have insurance, who were denied coverage.
Our current insurance system places the monitary priority to the share holders & maintain profits, and NOT to the insured.
Its simple.. Insurance companies should actually insure their patients. They should give the benefits they promise to the patients, in need the need for patients to file endorsed action to get the coverage they rewarded for.
Having nationalized medicine in a capitalist socieity is not a upright mix imo. We would be giving more tax dollars into the hands of private businesses whose primary hope is to make a profit.
I do not see the government limiting the profits of those companies.
Start asking yourself why the medication is so much cheaper within those other countries? Its because the pharm companies can charge the insurance companies so much. So they do. Its because the FDA has limited our choices when it comes to over the counter & prescription drugs, giving particular companies monopolies over certain types of drugs. The FDA also restricting and invalidating the benefits of holistic medicines & innate remedies, forcing us to rely on the medical industrial complex to solve our problems.
Some natural remedies (such as weed for some ailments) are illegeal, forcing us to rely on higher priced prescriptions.
Check out Ron Pauls page where on earth he talks about heathcare. With so various years as a physician, he knows first hand the problems doctors own with the insuance companies. Source(s): RonPaul2008.com
I totally agree.
I am not familiar near health care anywhere but Canada and the U.S.A. But base on that, I feel Canada is doing a better job adjectives around.
Don't forget Michael Moore's "documents" are exagerated and sometimes to the extreme.
But, I do believe universal health attention would greatly benefit our country in the long run. The problem, how much it'll cost the government to gain it up and running.
My solution, stop the funds towards the war and use it for the program and our education system.
there are 3 solutions: socialized medicine, free flea market healthcare, or the corporate system we have now.
socialism may nouns like the best choice, but i assure u it is not. the free market system would work cheaper and more effectively beside everyone if they'd remove some governmental regulations.
also, when u give the system to the government, the establishment gets to decide which treatments work for you, and which won't. this should be a finding between patients and doctors. Source(s): Ron Paul on Health Care (some clips from sicko): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=287IQ_7Qj…
No such thing as free. Someone pays for it, whether it is the sick personage, insurance company, taxpayer, healthcare provider, etc. Doctors in other countries do the exact same thing. There isn't adequate money for everyone to have every procedure....in Canada, France, Japan, etc., culture still die waiting for an available procedure.
That is not denying a right to life. Hospitals don't go around shooting or stabbing inhabitants. You are just as 'responsible' for not paying for their procedure as anybody else.
I agree that Moore is deceiving in his doco - I lived adjectives my life in Canada and, while you don't enjoy to pay for health trouble, you certainly get what you clear for! The waiting times are so ridiculous, people often stir across the border and pay for things like MRI's and cat-scans because otherwise they'd be waiting for a year. A YEAR! Can you picture blowing out your knee and having to dawdle a year to get an MRI to see what's wrong. Then, you'll need to capture on a waiting list to see a specialist, then a surgeon, afterwards get on the surgery waiting list. By after, you'll be retired so I guess it won't matter so much! If it's not life-threatening, you're screwed. If it is life-threatening, you're double screwed. It sucks! I'd rather rate if given the choice.
I expect it's a good idea, but it's probably too sturdy to implement in the USA.
Also -- London isn't a country.
It would be a exceedingly good thing unsurprisingly and help many nation, but our country is in so much debt right now I doubt it would ensue. It would just dig our country into a deeper hole and is not a top priority, especially near the wars going on.
I'm not saying that I don't agree near your no money no operatoin policy is wrong, because I do. I just think its not something that will be scheduled anytime soon.
Nothing is free. Taxes would go up to pay for it. I prefer making my own decision about my health. We can adjectives see how well government agencies work here. Just look at the VA or any other affairs of state agency.
Canada,France and London have the right idea.I agree
lol...I see you watched sicko, I am canadian living in US and I expect it's better to be here and have my husbands insurance. otherwise if you are on hmo you are nothing different from those countries.
I agree next to Moore he has a point. but tell me something what's stopping you guys from going to one of those countries?? no situation what happens with vigour everyone cares about money, and surrounded by that US currency rocks! and that's what keeps everyone from talking going on for health insurance.
i dont know what i am talking more or less i got so much to say ,but it's this request for information requires an essay answer.....dont have time for that
Related Questions:
- I call for dental work BAD...no insurance! Anyone know of a dental college surrounded by Las Vegas, that does work for free?
- How can i seize free medical and dental insurance?
- I Need to Get Free Pills at Planned Parenthood. Should I Tell them I Have Insurance or Say I Don't?
- If you own insurance on your phone is a replacement phone free?
- I stipulation a dentist for free. I enjoy a horrible toothache, but I own no brass and no insurance. Can anyone backing?