Is the public remedy the one point that will force Insurance Industries subsidise into free flea market capitalism?
Is that why they are so afraid of the public option. It would mean losing the monopolies they very soon control and losing a lot of the ill gotten gain that monopolies bring industry.
Answers:
If the gov. looked-for to take over your business or company from the cellar to the roof, assuming you enjoy employment, you would be concerned too.
There is no "OPTION" in the unconstitutional federal government's takeover of the condition care industry. Everyone will be forced to pay for it so not a soul can "opt out" of paying for the socialist program. You can't provide the Article, Section, paragraph and Clause of the Constitution of the United States that allows the federal government to interfere in strength care. Insurance companies are already in the free flea market.
You nail it. Insurance companies want to keep their monopoly over the people. We can't really blame them. What is discouraged is the media and corporations voice vs. the peoples voice, that is sorrowful.
Listen it isn't the insurance companies...it is the lawsuits and Medicaid...Fraud and corruption....FIX THIS FIRST....
REFORM is needed....THE GOVERNMENT CANNOT RUN ANYTHING...LOOK AROUND...
There will be no public option. The insurance companies have greased the right wheel.
I guess we can scratch "economics" along with "history" and "civics" as classes they don't bother to edify in high college anymore...
People are going to pay twice for insurance. The "option" will be you paying once -- having insurance on the side will require you to settle up twice. The opportunity cost is too great if you can receive like services/products through a program your FORCED to pay for.
Just approaching in Hawaii -- millions will flock to the "option" -- leaving insurance companies w/ smaller samples/populations and compromising the statistics that kind them a viable entity. Prices will have to rise to compensate -- more people will leave them for the "option." Prices will have to rise again to compensate -- more general public will abandon them.
Econ 101 teaches give or take a few substitutes, opportunity cost, cost/quantity relationships and utility.
The "option" is a foot in the door to single-payer. It'll likely run private companies out of business long permanent status.
No? Seems for the past few decades that's all Democrats would confer about -- and now adjectives of a sudden not a peep? They all know the smaller amount they talk about it, the more imagined they'll get this legislation through and get one step closer to taking over the undamaged thing.
Be careful what you ask for -- you newly might get it.
I prefer my Government to legislate industry policies FOR businesses, not run them.
"Deficit Neutral" as claimed by Obama; HR3200 = http://smokebreak.blogshevik.com/wp-cont…
And while I'm at crackpot economic policies:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424…
Yes.
Related Questions:
Answers:
If the gov. looked-for to take over your business or company from the cellar to the roof, assuming you enjoy employment, you would be concerned too.
There is no "OPTION" in the unconstitutional federal government's takeover of the condition care industry. Everyone will be forced to pay for it so not a soul can "opt out" of paying for the socialist program. You can't provide the Article, Section, paragraph and Clause of the Constitution of the United States that allows the federal government to interfere in strength care. Insurance companies are already in the free flea market.
You nail it. Insurance companies want to keep their monopoly over the people. We can't really blame them. What is discouraged is the media and corporations voice vs. the peoples voice, that is sorrowful.
Listen it isn't the insurance companies...it is the lawsuits and Medicaid...Fraud and corruption....FIX THIS FIRST....
REFORM is needed....THE GOVERNMENT CANNOT RUN ANYTHING...LOOK AROUND...
There will be no public option. The insurance companies have greased the right wheel.
I guess we can scratch "economics" along with "history" and "civics" as classes they don't bother to edify in high college anymore...
People are going to pay twice for insurance. The "option" will be you paying once -- having insurance on the side will require you to settle up twice. The opportunity cost is too great if you can receive like services/products through a program your FORCED to pay for.
Just approaching in Hawaii -- millions will flock to the "option" -- leaving insurance companies w/ smaller samples/populations and compromising the statistics that kind them a viable entity. Prices will have to rise to compensate -- more people will leave them for the "option." Prices will have to rise again to compensate -- more general public will abandon them.
Econ 101 teaches give or take a few substitutes, opportunity cost, cost/quantity relationships and utility.
The "option" is a foot in the door to single-payer. It'll likely run private companies out of business long permanent status.
No? Seems for the past few decades that's all Democrats would confer about -- and now adjectives of a sudden not a peep? They all know the smaller amount they talk about it, the more imagined they'll get this legislation through and get one step closer to taking over the undamaged thing.
Be careful what you ask for -- you newly might get it.
I prefer my Government to legislate industry policies FOR businesses, not run them.
"Deficit Neutral" as claimed by Obama; HR3200 = http://smokebreak.blogshevik.com/wp-cont…
And while I'm at crackpot economic policies:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424…
Yes.
Related Questions:
- Without insurance how can one find a free eye exam and goggles?
- Do you cogitate vigour insurance or free healthcare is a right?
- Is a time insurance policy pay-out toll free?
- I am a 22-year-old poor college student, do I qualify for any free robustness insurance?
- If you own phone insurance does that have it in mind if you break you your carry equal one for free?