If you don't own condition insurance why wouldn't you vote for someone that is to say going to supply it to you for free
Would you consider this pandering to the "less fortunate"?
Answers:
Yea, let's newly give more money to insurance corporations. I mean, they own always been here for us.
Right? It's not like they spend most of their money in administrative costs. It's not as though their largest purpose is to deny your claim. Hey, it is not as if life is an inalienable right.
It costs money and taxes are already to high. Where are you going to bring back the money?
Because "for free" doesn't exist. What really happens is the government take the money from you, uses it, while wasting some on the way.
Nothing is free. Government health perfectionism would be payed for by taxes. Which means everyone would pay. So presently I gotta pay for my health charge and yours? Screw that. You going to buy me a car?
If you don't have health insurance why wouldn't you earn it by your own merit to some extent than voting for someone that is going to give it to you for free ( free characterization paid for by some other person who have enough self-respect to have a charge and pay taxes) ?
I didnt have condition insurance. I purchased it myself until I did have health insurance.
When race do not have to pay for something, they will name-calling it. Maybe not you but its human nature.
Right now Medicaid is one of the most abused GOVT programs and it offer health insurance to those that acnnot afford it. It costs the tax payers billions.
Nobody can be denied treatment from a public hospital. A national robustness care system would bankrupt this nation faster than any period of war could hope to do. Who would pay for it? Tax payers and no thanks, I close to pay too much in taxes as it is.
Free health insurance. I've never heard of that one earlier.
I think what you must be thinking is a national health INSURANCE policy. Everyone pays contained by an equal percentage of their income, and get equal amounts of health thoroughness and prescription coverage. 17 other countries have been doing it for decades and enjoy health care system far superior to ours at a much lower cost.
But free? No, you're dreaming.
Nothing is free .so what you really mean is vote for the soul who will take money from someone else and pay for your insurance.
Maybe..is anyone saying that they are going to give americans FREE healthcare?
I can not afford health insurance. I am already old-fashioned, and I have never been covered by condition insurance, on or off the job. No, I would not vote for "free" strength insurance. 50 years ago, they calculated that for every dollar in benefits (health, roads, you name it) it cost $100. Think what it is today.
My biggest objection is that such a plan would be similar to the "assisted income" programs in Florida and other states: you can wait the entire daylight, be yelled at, cursed at, spend hours trying to convince someone that you have a strength problem, probably will not get enough medication, attain the wrong medication, etc.
In other words, no doctor is better than theirs. Source(s): life; been near, done that
Yippee! Bread and Circuses!
Let's vote ourselves riches!
No, I newly don't want/need health insurance. I would consider it socialism.
P.S. Nothing in go is 'free'.
Its possible that the other opinions and views just about other things may not be agreeable with a person.
Yeah perchance they'll get health insurance, but other things that the competitor will change may not be suitable for this character.
Some society don't want the government getting more involved than they already are. If we give everyone free strength insurance, who do you think is going to pay for that?
For tons of the Clinton years I was not permanently employed (not his glitch BTW) and had no medical coverage. I did not support universal Health comfort then because I knew my situation would switch, and more government programs would mean more taxes, more bureaucracy, and smaller quantity choices for everyone who would already be covered under their private insurance plan.
Because I'm not an illiberal or a theif.
Poor people usually do one of two things:
1) Never vote
2) Vote democrat
So if they cared satisfactory or even knew when election morning was, they more than likely would vote for the politician within favor of socialized healthcare by default.
Since most people minus health care are poor and/or ignorant, they are not generally the type of people who vote. However, if the poor and/or not conversant do vote, it is almost entirely democrat, so I don't know if the health insurance promises make an impact. I would still phone it pandering.
That is the logic used by liberals to buy votes.
Because it will not be free. And honestly, i'm tired of fitting(i.e paying for) more tax bills.
In liberal utopia maybe.
In reality, nought is free.
"A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority other votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is other followed by a dictatorship."
This has been attributed to numerous authors, usually any Alexander Tyler or Alexander Fraser Tytler, although it's never been verified that either one in reality said it. Either way though, it's a telling bit of logic. Why WOULDN'T you vote yourself a big contribution from the "public" coffers? They're filled up by people richer than you! Until as expected the rich are brought down to your level, and suddenly you're the one who has to support everyone below you. Eventually there's a collapse, because nobody have enough money to pay the bills. Nothing is free, it's only just a question of who has to earnings.
Nothings free dude.
Here is where on earth we pay for it:
1. Taxes will skyrocket. How else will they pay for it? Taxes are resembling to be as high as what you would pay for a great medical insurance policy right in a minute, not including discounted group rates or as an employment benifit.
2. The quality of medical care as a full will drop significantly, look at the VA and/or Canada's health care system. They both suck.
The with the sole purpose people who won't pay for it i.e. taxes are the inhabitants who will use it the most, welfare, homeless, etc.
So in other words I have to income to insure you??
Not a chance in hell. Get a charge that has them, then you can contribute to them.
I would love to own a Million dollar house and you to pay for it. How do you like that I want you to repay for it?
Because the one entity I would despise more than lacking health insurance would be paying excess taxes that wouldn't do the position anyway.
Of course you would but the number is relatively small and wouldn't be enough to win an election unless it be very close in specific states.
Related Questions:
Answers:
Yea, let's newly give more money to insurance corporations. I mean, they own always been here for us.
Right? It's not like they spend most of their money in administrative costs. It's not as though their largest purpose is to deny your claim. Hey, it is not as if life is an inalienable right.
It costs money and taxes are already to high. Where are you going to bring back the money?
Because "for free" doesn't exist. What really happens is the government take the money from you, uses it, while wasting some on the way.
Nothing is free. Government health perfectionism would be payed for by taxes. Which means everyone would pay. So presently I gotta pay for my health charge and yours? Screw that. You going to buy me a car?
If you don't have health insurance why wouldn't you earn it by your own merit to some extent than voting for someone that is going to give it to you for free ( free characterization paid for by some other person who have enough self-respect to have a charge and pay taxes) ?
I didnt have condition insurance. I purchased it myself until I did have health insurance.
When race do not have to pay for something, they will name-calling it. Maybe not you but its human nature.
Right now Medicaid is one of the most abused GOVT programs and it offer health insurance to those that acnnot afford it. It costs the tax payers billions.
Nobody can be denied treatment from a public hospital. A national robustness care system would bankrupt this nation faster than any period of war could hope to do. Who would pay for it? Tax payers and no thanks, I close to pay too much in taxes as it is.
Free health insurance. I've never heard of that one earlier.
I think what you must be thinking is a national health INSURANCE policy. Everyone pays contained by an equal percentage of their income, and get equal amounts of health thoroughness and prescription coverage. 17 other countries have been doing it for decades and enjoy health care system far superior to ours at a much lower cost.
But free? No, you're dreaming.
Nothing is free .so what you really mean is vote for the soul who will take money from someone else and pay for your insurance.
Maybe..is anyone saying that they are going to give americans FREE healthcare?
I can not afford health insurance. I am already old-fashioned, and I have never been covered by condition insurance, on or off the job. No, I would not vote for "free" strength insurance. 50 years ago, they calculated that for every dollar in benefits (health, roads, you name it) it cost $100. Think what it is today.
My biggest objection is that such a plan would be similar to the "assisted income" programs in Florida and other states: you can wait the entire daylight, be yelled at, cursed at, spend hours trying to convince someone that you have a strength problem, probably will not get enough medication, attain the wrong medication, etc.
In other words, no doctor is better than theirs. Source(s): life; been near, done that
Yippee! Bread and Circuses!
Let's vote ourselves riches!
No, I newly don't want/need health insurance. I would consider it socialism.
P.S. Nothing in go is 'free'.
Its possible that the other opinions and views just about other things may not be agreeable with a person.
Yeah perchance they'll get health insurance, but other things that the competitor will change may not be suitable for this character.
Some society don't want the government getting more involved than they already are. If we give everyone free strength insurance, who do you think is going to pay for that?
For tons of the Clinton years I was not permanently employed (not his glitch BTW) and had no medical coverage. I did not support universal Health comfort then because I knew my situation would switch, and more government programs would mean more taxes, more bureaucracy, and smaller quantity choices for everyone who would already be covered under their private insurance plan.
Because I'm not an illiberal or a theif.
Poor people usually do one of two things:
1) Never vote
2) Vote democrat
So if they cared satisfactory or even knew when election morning was, they more than likely would vote for the politician within favor of socialized healthcare by default.
Since most people minus health care are poor and/or ignorant, they are not generally the type of people who vote. However, if the poor and/or not conversant do vote, it is almost entirely democrat, so I don't know if the health insurance promises make an impact. I would still phone it pandering.
That is the logic used by liberals to buy votes.
Because it will not be free. And honestly, i'm tired of fitting(i.e paying for) more tax bills.
In liberal utopia maybe.
In reality, nought is free.
"A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority other votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is other followed by a dictatorship."
This has been attributed to numerous authors, usually any Alexander Tyler or Alexander Fraser Tytler, although it's never been verified that either one in reality said it. Either way though, it's a telling bit of logic. Why WOULDN'T you vote yourself a big contribution from the "public" coffers? They're filled up by people richer than you! Until as expected the rich are brought down to your level, and suddenly you're the one who has to support everyone below you. Eventually there's a collapse, because nobody have enough money to pay the bills. Nothing is free, it's only just a question of who has to earnings.
Nothings free dude.
Here is where on earth we pay for it:
1. Taxes will skyrocket. How else will they pay for it? Taxes are resembling to be as high as what you would pay for a great medical insurance policy right in a minute, not including discounted group rates or as an employment benifit.
2. The quality of medical care as a full will drop significantly, look at the VA and/or Canada's health care system. They both suck.
The with the sole purpose people who won't pay for it i.e. taxes are the inhabitants who will use it the most, welfare, homeless, etc.
So in other words I have to income to insure you??
Not a chance in hell. Get a charge that has them, then you can contribute to them.
I would love to own a Million dollar house and you to pay for it. How do you like that I want you to repay for it?
Because the one entity I would despise more than lacking health insurance would be paying excess taxes that wouldn't do the position anyway.
Of course you would but the number is relatively small and wouldn't be enough to win an election unless it be very close in specific states.
Related Questions:
- Any companies that set aside free condition insurance for redundant workers or proletarian workers?
- Free Overseas Student Health Insurance or Cover?
- BD 1400 + BD 560 HRA + BD 130 Transpo Allowance + Free Full Medical Insurance for Family of 5 ++++?
- Will insurance repair a saloon windshield for free within florida?
- Free insurance training?