What if we fixed the PUBLIC OPTION to merely those who cannot afford or qualify to buy HEALTHCARE insurance?
Wouldn't it make sense to limit the federal liability, and agree to the system that is working keep working?
Why disrupt middle class parents who are already buying their own healthcare and are content with what they have----isn't it too dangerous for the governing body to induce employers to drop healthcare options they provide their workforce by providing a fixed cost tax subsideized option? Won't most middle class parents lose the insurance they hold and they like and be forced on to an expanded version of Medicaid i.e. likely to offer unpardonable benefits?
Why are they trying to expand the failure of Medicaid to the middle class?
Answers:
or, just let those who want it apply, and contained by the future when others have see it work, or not, they can make an informed decision?
Point taken.
But that really doesn't address the core issue: Why do we pay twice what Japan, Singapore and the U.K. money? Why do we pay ten times what Taiwan pays?
Take a look...
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/hea_ex…
Disturbing, isn't it?
"
The more complex "the Bill" the more the Democrats can hide the true agenda at the rear the government takeover..
The problem I see is that once elected representatives gets a "foothold" there is nil to stop them.
Why not go back and look at the Regulatory system immediately in place and make adjustment accordingly? Too simple an idea.
Why not enjoy one generic form for all the companies who provide insurance and cut the red-tape? once again to simple
Why not look at the Commerce Laws and change the law regarding Insurance Practices and Procedures? Too simple.
Why not revamp the rules regarding the insurance to allow grouping of individuals; small businesses, i.e. non-union restaurants, non-union construction workers, non-union plumbers, non-union electricians, clerks, picnic basket weavers to "Pool"? I know to simple
All these concepts are not in the government plan.
If they really considered necessary to help the Americans; would this not be a first step in reform, Instead of a total take over by Government?
The Government could tilt the monetary limits for medicade and still save Billions over what the are proposing in a minute.~!
that was tried surrounded by Hawaii in i believe 2005, the program was insolvent inwardly 7 months of inception and was shut down by orders of the Governor.
I would not enjoy any problem with a public option for the poor or uninsured, oh keep on, we basically have that already. You can waddle into any public hospital and they must treat you whether you are insured or not and regardless of your ability to pay or not. By the passageway, even illegal immigrants obtain this service for free and they are all making tax free money beside the jobs they hold. So, maybe the portion of what the management pays to these hospitals is a large reason why medicare or our robustness system is going broke now. So I guess putting all Americans on simply the same system would really cost a fortune.
Related Questions:
Why disrupt middle class parents who are already buying their own healthcare and are content with what they have----isn't it too dangerous for the governing body to induce employers to drop healthcare options they provide their workforce by providing a fixed cost tax subsideized option? Won't most middle class parents lose the insurance they hold and they like and be forced on to an expanded version of Medicaid i.e. likely to offer unpardonable benefits?
Why are they trying to expand the failure of Medicaid to the middle class?
Answers:
or, just let those who want it apply, and contained by the future when others have see it work, or not, they can make an informed decision?
Point taken.
But that really doesn't address the core issue: Why do we pay twice what Japan, Singapore and the U.K. money? Why do we pay ten times what Taiwan pays?
Take a look...
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/hea_ex…
Disturbing, isn't it?
"
The more complex "the Bill" the more the Democrats can hide the true agenda at the rear the government takeover..
The problem I see is that once elected representatives gets a "foothold" there is nil to stop them.
Why not go back and look at the Regulatory system immediately in place and make adjustment accordingly? Too simple an idea.
Why not enjoy one generic form for all the companies who provide insurance and cut the red-tape? once again to simple
Why not look at the Commerce Laws and change the law regarding Insurance Practices and Procedures? Too simple.
Why not revamp the rules regarding the insurance to allow grouping of individuals; small businesses, i.e. non-union restaurants, non-union construction workers, non-union plumbers, non-union electricians, clerks, picnic basket weavers to "Pool"? I know to simple
All these concepts are not in the government plan.
If they really considered necessary to help the Americans; would this not be a first step in reform, Instead of a total take over by Government?
The Government could tilt the monetary limits for medicade and still save Billions over what the are proposing in a minute.~!
that was tried surrounded by Hawaii in i believe 2005, the program was insolvent inwardly 7 months of inception and was shut down by orders of the Governor.
I would not enjoy any problem with a public option for the poor or uninsured, oh keep on, we basically have that already. You can waddle into any public hospital and they must treat you whether you are insured or not and regardless of your ability to pay or not. By the passageway, even illegal immigrants obtain this service for free and they are all making tax free money beside the jobs they hold. So, maybe the portion of what the management pays to these hospitals is a large reason why medicare or our robustness system is going broke now. So I guess putting all Americans on simply the same system would really cost a fortune.
Related Questions:
- Should I purchase owner's title insurance if I buy a house surrounded by Watertown NY?
- How do you try to buy or bid on totaled vehicle by motor insurance companies?
- Should you buy travel insurance for a cruise through the cruise string or your travel agent?
- Should the U.S. force population to wages a "fee" if they backfire to buy condition insurance?
- Buying a motor contained by a month or so and don't hold insurance?