Liberals, are you merry that not a soul will be capable of buy or trade private form insurance anymore...?
and government bureaucrats will be making your health decision now. And are you happy more or less the long waiting times (months) and rationing that will be happening?
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.vie…
Answers:
the sky is falling the sky is falling
Yes they love this. They dont want companies to run healthcare, they want the government to get its hand on everything it can to "spread the wealth around".
to hoohaw:
Have you read all 1,000 page of the bill? Well of course you hadn't, but some have and they discovered on pg. 17 the bill say exactly that: Dems are nixing private individual health plans. And the rest of the private plans will go beneath too....the government can print money to make the "public option" available, not a soul company can compete with that AND the rest of the market. It a short time ago isn't possible. Source(s): Econ 101
The departed will be happy when America is fully under their control and Government owns and controls everything or should I articulate when (mommy and daddy) control everything. Make no mistake "the left hates freedom" because freedom medium people are free to make decision and do things the left would object too.
The vanished has no faith or trust surrounded by the people they are a bunch of arrogant elitist who believe most people are morons except for themselves as expected.
Liberals think deep down inside that it will not affect them as long as they hold supporting the Democratic Party. The Govt Run Health Care will put a premium on ethnic status, sexual preference then do affiliation. The old will be left to die, or given discomfort killers and told to live with it consequently die because they are no longer cheap to keep alive. This is the absolutely worst policy lone followed by Cap and Trade.
Its easy to think that "socialized" public vigour care is a bad and cynical idea. As a social worker/graduate student with no insurance, I own a pretty good grasp as to how poorly the current system we have is not doing the errand we want it to. So many people, single mothers, children, the mentally disabled as ably as those with substance abuse problems and psychiatric diagnoses enjoy been continually under-served by the private system we currently have. Medicare and Medicaid are not sufficient forms of funding for ample people. Many people in need insurance are forced to pay outrageous emergency room fees, often next to extreme wait times. Many young society, fresh out of college don't have medical coverage because they can't afford it. We are paying off student loans, hundreds of dollars a month, that put away up most of our income. my friend pays over 400 dollars a month, which is just about 2 weeks wage. She hasn't worked long enough to get insurance from her employer, and commonly many people contained by the service industry are not employed "full time" so they aren't offered insurance. There are also working families whose jobs don't extend affordable coverage to people who are not eligible for medicaid. The great majority of the 46.6 million uninsured Americans are not eligible for Medicaid:
* The majority of the uninsured (25.8 million) are childless adults under the age of 65. People in need dependent children are generally ineligible for Medicaid, no matter how poor they are.
* Medicaid covers some working parents, but they commonly must have extremely low incomes. In the median (or typical) state in 2005, Medicaid be available only to parents whose annual incomes were below 67 percent of the poverty file, or $10,849 for a family of three. Parents with incomes above this smooth were ineligible. As a result, the overwhelming bulk of full-time working parents are ineligible for Medicaid; they cannot get it if their employer fail to offer coverage. Census data indicate that 9.5 million non-elderly parents who are uninsured own incomes above 67 percent of the poverty line.
America, despite our amazing medical technology does not offer access to this treatment to adjectives people. If you have private insurance, great, you can use it, but for, sorry. It is really sad that a country with the resources we own, that we can't take care of our own ancestors. Americans has a shorter life expectancy than Canadians, the French, Italians, Antiguans, Japanese, Aussies, and Swedes (and masses others) this is spending 16% of our GDP on health care, where on earth most of the other countries spend around 10% or less and still maintain great vigour coverage. One of my classmates, a Canadian, swears by her countries medical coverage; she says the "scare tactic" claims give or take a few long lines and inept doctors are myths.
It is easy to say that citizens are lazy or don't deserve health aid, it is easy to believe that private insurance is the way to step because it works for you if you have it. There are so many folks who need medical coverage that don't have it. I deliberate it is ridiculously sad that in a country beside the resources we have, that we can't take caution of people. The system we have does not work, and we obligation to try something else. Source(s): http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&id=670
http://seekingalpha.com/article/146992-c…
You breed it sound like the bill have already passed... it hasn't. If you want an idea of what national health protection would be like, go to any developed nation within the world other than the United States. I think you would find that it really isn't as fruitless as our current 37th-place "health care" system is.
Good points Julia. I do not want universal vigour care it will be a disaster.
I hold a customer with 20 employees that will shut down without delay. Way to go Obama!
Yes. They are.
The bill Congressional Democrats just dumped on the floor is all of the following:
- Exactly what Obama promised from the start
- Exactly what Conservatives own been warning in the region of.
- Exactly what all Democrats, including the ones who WROTE the bill said would "never happen"
- Is fully supported by 100% of liberals, all of whom also STILL deny its actual PUBLISHED contents exist.
"And yes, I did read it. Not the entire bill yet, but at lowest those pages."
Suuuuure you did.
You need a more reliable source than what you provide. Also, from the google link you provided, this is surrounded by the first article: "So who is right? IBD is closer to the truth. Ying is right in that the House plan will not outlaw all individual vigour insurance."
I would recommend removing yourselves from the vices associated with tunnel daydream. If you look to Europe, where many countries hold universal healthcare, you will see that they boast some of the best health prudence plans in the world. Or if you look at Canada, or Cuba, or any country with Universal Healthcare, you will spy this trend. Rise above the fear-mongering of the conservative pundits and see for yourself.
Liberals won't be happy until we've lost adjectives our freedom
That's factually incorrect. Are you lying or trying to be willfully stupid? Either route, try again with something that is fatually accurate and from a credible source.
No, that's not what it's about (I'm assuming you're referring to the famous "page 16" reference).
That part refers to grandfathered health coverage. After the bill is implemented (called "Y1"), within will be requirements for private coverage to adhere to. The grandfathered health coverage will not enjoy to adhere to those requirements. It does not mean it will be undemocratic to purchase it.
And yes, I did read it. Not the entire bill yet, but at least those page.
Edit to Marcia N: Yes, I did read it, despite your snotty remark. You could, too, here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/dis…
Another Edit (since you don't allow email): Perhaps you did not continue to read the bill to page 19. “Individual health insurance coverage explicitly not grandfathered health insurance coverage under subsection (a) may single be offered on or after the first day of Y1 as an Exchange-participating health benefits plan. ”
It does not outlaw individual private coverage – you can still buy the plan on the Exchange where on earth they will compete with the public option, not be replaced by it. The good thing of the Exchange, is that the coverage no longer has one of the problems of individual coverage – skyrocketing premiums should you become ill.
Related Questions:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.vie…
Answers:
the sky is falling the sky is falling
Yes they love this. They dont want companies to run healthcare, they want the government to get its hand on everything it can to "spread the wealth around".
to hoohaw:
Have you read all 1,000 page of the bill? Well of course you hadn't, but some have and they discovered on pg. 17 the bill say exactly that: Dems are nixing private individual health plans. And the rest of the private plans will go beneath too....the government can print money to make the "public option" available, not a soul company can compete with that AND the rest of the market. It a short time ago isn't possible. Source(s): Econ 101
The departed will be happy when America is fully under their control and Government owns and controls everything or should I articulate when (mommy and daddy) control everything. Make no mistake "the left hates freedom" because freedom medium people are free to make decision and do things the left would object too.
The vanished has no faith or trust surrounded by the people they are a bunch of arrogant elitist who believe most people are morons except for themselves as expected.
Liberals think deep down inside that it will not affect them as long as they hold supporting the Democratic Party. The Govt Run Health Care will put a premium on ethnic status, sexual preference then do affiliation. The old will be left to die, or given discomfort killers and told to live with it consequently die because they are no longer cheap to keep alive. This is the absolutely worst policy lone followed by Cap and Trade.
Its easy to think that "socialized" public vigour care is a bad and cynical idea. As a social worker/graduate student with no insurance, I own a pretty good grasp as to how poorly the current system we have is not doing the errand we want it to. So many people, single mothers, children, the mentally disabled as ably as those with substance abuse problems and psychiatric diagnoses enjoy been continually under-served by the private system we currently have. Medicare and Medicaid are not sufficient forms of funding for ample people. Many people in need insurance are forced to pay outrageous emergency room fees, often next to extreme wait times. Many young society, fresh out of college don't have medical coverage because they can't afford it. We are paying off student loans, hundreds of dollars a month, that put away up most of our income. my friend pays over 400 dollars a month, which is just about 2 weeks wage. She hasn't worked long enough to get insurance from her employer, and commonly many people contained by the service industry are not employed "full time" so they aren't offered insurance. There are also working families whose jobs don't extend affordable coverage to people who are not eligible for medicaid. The great majority of the 46.6 million uninsured Americans are not eligible for Medicaid:
* The majority of the uninsured (25.8 million) are childless adults under the age of 65. People in need dependent children are generally ineligible for Medicaid, no matter how poor they are.
* Medicaid covers some working parents, but they commonly must have extremely low incomes. In the median (or typical) state in 2005, Medicaid be available only to parents whose annual incomes were below 67 percent of the poverty file, or $10,849 for a family of three. Parents with incomes above this smooth were ineligible. As a result, the overwhelming bulk of full-time working parents are ineligible for Medicaid; they cannot get it if their employer fail to offer coverage. Census data indicate that 9.5 million non-elderly parents who are uninsured own incomes above 67 percent of the poverty line.
America, despite our amazing medical technology does not offer access to this treatment to adjectives people. If you have private insurance, great, you can use it, but for, sorry. It is really sad that a country with the resources we own, that we can't take care of our own ancestors. Americans has a shorter life expectancy than Canadians, the French, Italians, Antiguans, Japanese, Aussies, and Swedes (and masses others) this is spending 16% of our GDP on health care, where on earth most of the other countries spend around 10% or less and still maintain great vigour coverage. One of my classmates, a Canadian, swears by her countries medical coverage; she says the "scare tactic" claims give or take a few long lines and inept doctors are myths.
It is easy to say that citizens are lazy or don't deserve health aid, it is easy to believe that private insurance is the way to step because it works for you if you have it. There are so many folks who need medical coverage that don't have it. I deliberate it is ridiculously sad that in a country beside the resources we have, that we can't take caution of people. The system we have does not work, and we obligation to try something else. Source(s): http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&id=670
http://seekingalpha.com/article/146992-c…
You breed it sound like the bill have already passed... it hasn't. If you want an idea of what national health protection would be like, go to any developed nation within the world other than the United States. I think you would find that it really isn't as fruitless as our current 37th-place "health care" system is.
Good points Julia. I do not want universal vigour care it will be a disaster.
I hold a customer with 20 employees that will shut down without delay. Way to go Obama!
Yes. They are.
The bill Congressional Democrats just dumped on the floor is all of the following:
- Exactly what Obama promised from the start
- Exactly what Conservatives own been warning in the region of.
- Exactly what all Democrats, including the ones who WROTE the bill said would "never happen"
- Is fully supported by 100% of liberals, all of whom also STILL deny its actual PUBLISHED contents exist.
"And yes, I did read it. Not the entire bill yet, but at lowest those pages."
Suuuuure you did.
You need a more reliable source than what you provide. Also, from the google link you provided, this is surrounded by the first article: "So who is right? IBD is closer to the truth. Ying is right in that the House plan will not outlaw all individual vigour insurance."
I would recommend removing yourselves from the vices associated with tunnel daydream. If you look to Europe, where many countries hold universal healthcare, you will see that they boast some of the best health prudence plans in the world. Or if you look at Canada, or Cuba, or any country with Universal Healthcare, you will spy this trend. Rise above the fear-mongering of the conservative pundits and see for yourself.
Liberals won't be happy until we've lost adjectives our freedom
That's factually incorrect. Are you lying or trying to be willfully stupid? Either route, try again with something that is fatually accurate and from a credible source.
No, that's not what it's about (I'm assuming you're referring to the famous "page 16" reference).
That part refers to grandfathered health coverage. After the bill is implemented (called "Y1"), within will be requirements for private coverage to adhere to. The grandfathered health coverage will not enjoy to adhere to those requirements. It does not mean it will be undemocratic to purchase it.
And yes, I did read it. Not the entire bill yet, but at least those page.
Edit to Marcia N: Yes, I did read it, despite your snotty remark. You could, too, here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/dis…
Another Edit (since you don't allow email): Perhaps you did not continue to read the bill to page 19. “Individual health insurance coverage explicitly not grandfathered health insurance coverage under subsection (a) may single be offered on or after the first day of Y1 as an Exchange-participating health benefits plan. ”
It does not outlaw individual private coverage – you can still buy the plan on the Exchange where on earth they will compete with the public option, not be replaced by it. The good thing of the Exchange, is that the coverage no longer has one of the problems of individual coverage – skyrocketing premiums should you become ill.
Related Questions:
- I JUST BOUGHT TENANT'S INSURANCE ; why would the tenant (my father) be against this?
- Do I entail insurance to drive newly bought coup home? If not, what is home surrounded by that skin?
- What is the point of getting insurance when you can buy hot stuff?
- When will I want to buy other business insurance for my saloon?
- Can I buy vivacity insurance if its possible I enjoy a brain tumor? I live surrounded by California.?