Govt Healthcare - Why not govt funded auto insurance?
I keep hearing family that we have a problem in the USA that ancestors do not have health insurance. Another problem we enjoy is that people do not drive with mediocre auto insurance or collision.
To me the government does not belong mandating healthcare coverage, however this train wreck is coming down the pike concrete soon. Since we are into the social programs, why don't we make auto insurance a government funded program as resourcefully. That way we all hold equal coverage should we get into an accident.
Thoughts on this crazy concept?
Answers:
Stupid getting the governing body involved in insurance of any kind.
Slippery slope to start going down.
If you're one serious instead of sarcastic: it's VERY unfortunate that you're equating talent, affordable healthcare to a privilege. Because driving a vehicle is a PRIVILEGE. Receiving 'quality', low-cost health care shouldn't be an opportunity. It shouldn't even be up for debate.
People are so quick to trivialize the significance of the healthcare crisis. There are millions of 'under' & 'uninsured' american families individual forced to endure this reality.
And by no funds am I saying, allow the government to control healthcare 'carte blanche'. But in that is a DIRE need to overhaul the current system.
(*reform = regulating the insurance, healthcare & pharmacutical industries, etc...)
And just as an FYI.. did you know your elected official receive FREE HEALTH CARE for life. That is in adjunct to the HEALTHY pensions they receive once they leave department. Where's the outrage in that? Millions of us go lacking - while they receive unlimited services. They were able to make an agreement on their TAXPAYER funded healthcare coverage - but they CONTINUE to debate over coverage for the rest of the country.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/200…
Man, I wish they would fund auto insurance. I am 21 with 3 tickets. I wage 860 dollars every six months for car insurance.
People don't die or suffer because of a lack of coupé insurance
are you comparing the insurance for a coupé to insurance for people?
theres your problem; people are more high-status than machines...and citizens vote and have rights, unlike machines.
Driving a car is not a requirement for someone to live.... while medical precision is
Please don't give the left wing liberal loonies any thinking. If socialized medicine were enact, there would be a part of it applicable to auto insurance. Most auto policies incldue medical payments coverage. That coverage would not be needed. Source(s): Retired claims adjuster.
Why not govt funded SCOTCH!!
At least if they were going to install gas ovens and hookups, I'd know to short Inergy.
I'm not sure whether your "crazy" idea is meant to be nasty.
However, there was a time when the tenet was based on concepts of right and wrong. Now it's base on the interests of lobbyists and the rich people they represent.
Making insurance mandatory, thereby punishing people who can't afford more than a third-hand wreck to use for commuting to work, is an example of the latter benevolent of law.
Yes, if we are to require poor people to hold auto insurance, and require them to get to work, often surrounded by areas where we've failed to devise any public transportation whatsoever, consequently we should subsidize their insurance.
But that won't happen because people are greedy. They chitchat a big line about total health insurance, but when anyone comes up with a plan, it become clear that it has to be paid for.
If we're that jaded in the physical well-being of our fellow humans, we're even less interested surrounded by any else's liabilities or financial lives.
I am sick to death of paying for auto insurance that I never use. And why do I own to pay for uninsured motorists if the law say you have to have insurance. I'm one punished because the authorities can't find the criminals?
I support govt. funded soup spoons
people are dieing at home because they cant afford form insrance and you want to be a smat-*** ! Source(s): smart A.s.s
Well, it is bad enough that they require drivers to purchase insurance (which harms both drivers and insurance companies, as drivers can't choose to single pay for the crashes they cause instead of subsidizing other people's accident and the insurance companies can't refuse to insure unsafe drivers, which raises everybody else's rates).
How almost we just repeal every "social program" that politicians have created over the closing century or so? None of them are doing any good at all (unless you consider harm the economy to be good, as plentiful people do).
Some provinces in Canada own both govt funded health care and auto insurance. For example British Columbia. is it a well-mannered idea? Who knows any way you pay.
Gee, shouldn't the government be handing out "free" stuff to adjectives of the citizens?
Isn't that how the founding fathers meant for it to be? An over-bloated, export tax gobbling, inefficient nanny state.
Housing is very expensive too, it is everyones right to hold a home, so let's make "the Government" pay for homes for adjectives citizens who can't afford it.
Where will they get the money you ask?
Easy, just bear more from the evil rich people and re-distribute it to everyone else, (the voters).
Yay Democrats!!
Related Questions:
To me the government does not belong mandating healthcare coverage, however this train wreck is coming down the pike concrete soon. Since we are into the social programs, why don't we make auto insurance a government funded program as resourcefully. That way we all hold equal coverage should we get into an accident.
Thoughts on this crazy concept?
Answers:
Stupid getting the governing body involved in insurance of any kind.
Slippery slope to start going down.
If you're one serious instead of sarcastic: it's VERY unfortunate that you're equating talent, affordable healthcare to a privilege. Because driving a vehicle is a PRIVILEGE. Receiving 'quality', low-cost health care shouldn't be an opportunity. It shouldn't even be up for debate.
People are so quick to trivialize the significance of the healthcare crisis. There are millions of 'under' & 'uninsured' american families individual forced to endure this reality.
And by no funds am I saying, allow the government to control healthcare 'carte blanche'. But in that is a DIRE need to overhaul the current system.
(*reform = regulating the insurance, healthcare & pharmacutical industries, etc...)
And just as an FYI.. did you know your elected official receive FREE HEALTH CARE for life. That is in adjunct to the HEALTHY pensions they receive once they leave department. Where's the outrage in that? Millions of us go lacking - while they receive unlimited services. They were able to make an agreement on their TAXPAYER funded healthcare coverage - but they CONTINUE to debate over coverage for the rest of the country.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/200…
Man, I wish they would fund auto insurance. I am 21 with 3 tickets. I wage 860 dollars every six months for car insurance.
People don't die or suffer because of a lack of coupé insurance
are you comparing the insurance for a coupé to insurance for people?
theres your problem; people are more high-status than machines...and citizens vote and have rights, unlike machines.
Driving a car is not a requirement for someone to live.... while medical precision is
Please don't give the left wing liberal loonies any thinking. If socialized medicine were enact, there would be a part of it applicable to auto insurance. Most auto policies incldue medical payments coverage. That coverage would not be needed. Source(s): Retired claims adjuster.
Why not govt funded SCOTCH!!
At least if they were going to install gas ovens and hookups, I'd know to short Inergy.
I'm not sure whether your "crazy" idea is meant to be nasty.
However, there was a time when the tenet was based on concepts of right and wrong. Now it's base on the interests of lobbyists and the rich people they represent.
Making insurance mandatory, thereby punishing people who can't afford more than a third-hand wreck to use for commuting to work, is an example of the latter benevolent of law.
Yes, if we are to require poor people to hold auto insurance, and require them to get to work, often surrounded by areas where we've failed to devise any public transportation whatsoever, consequently we should subsidize their insurance.
But that won't happen because people are greedy. They chitchat a big line about total health insurance, but when anyone comes up with a plan, it become clear that it has to be paid for.
If we're that jaded in the physical well-being of our fellow humans, we're even less interested surrounded by any else's liabilities or financial lives.
I am sick to death of paying for auto insurance that I never use. And why do I own to pay for uninsured motorists if the law say you have to have insurance. I'm one punished because the authorities can't find the criminals?
I support govt. funded soup spoons
people are dieing at home because they cant afford form insrance and you want to be a smat-*** ! Source(s): smart A.s.s
Well, it is bad enough that they require drivers to purchase insurance (which harms both drivers and insurance companies, as drivers can't choose to single pay for the crashes they cause instead of subsidizing other people's accident and the insurance companies can't refuse to insure unsafe drivers, which raises everybody else's rates).
How almost we just repeal every "social program" that politicians have created over the closing century or so? None of them are doing any good at all (unless you consider harm the economy to be good, as plentiful people do).
Some provinces in Canada own both govt funded health care and auto insurance. For example British Columbia. is it a well-mannered idea? Who knows any way you pay.
Gee, shouldn't the government be handing out "free" stuff to adjectives of the citizens?
Isn't that how the founding fathers meant for it to be? An over-bloated, export tax gobbling, inefficient nanny state.
Housing is very expensive too, it is everyones right to hold a home, so let's make "the Government" pay for homes for adjectives citizens who can't afford it.
Where will they get the money you ask?
Easy, just bear more from the evil rich people and re-distribute it to everyone else, (the voters).
Yay Democrats!!
Related Questions:
- Auto Insurance Question?
- Does anyone here enjoy Encompass Auto Insurance?
- Is at hand tool insurance contained by Michigan? My son is starting work within an auto shop, near his own tools.?
- Generally speaking, what's the cheapest auto insurance you could achieve?
- How to become a licensed auto insurance agent within CA?