If auto insurance be not required, what percentage of drivers do you ruminate would in truth buy it?
im guessing around 65%.......now, apply that to health protection and you see why everyone should have it. those who gamble, eventually lose and it forces others to settle up for their irresponsible decision making.
Answers:
Auto insurance has zilch to do with health insurance. For one, most states require that if an individual have enough $$, they can file a bond contained by lieu of insurance. AH, THE DEMS ARE CATERING TO THE WEATHLY!!
Number two, required auto insurance is not self protective. It only protects the others if you are involved in a crash. In accordance next to regulation, you are hung out to dry if you total your car.
It's comparing apples to oranges.
Related Questions:
Answers:
Auto insurance has zilch to do with health insurance. For one, most states require that if an individual have enough $$, they can file a bond contained by lieu of insurance. AH, THE DEMS ARE CATERING TO THE WEATHLY!!
Number two, required auto insurance is not self protective. It only protects the others if you are involved in a crash. In accordance next to regulation, you are hung out to dry if you total your car.
It's comparing apples to oranges.
Related Questions:
- Does anyone use or hear of Response.com for auto insurance?
- Can I get hold of auto insurance back I get hold of my driver's license?
- In Indiana, how much money should I ask for from an auto disaster insurance claim?
- What do you guys guess of the cavemen on the commercials for auto insurance?
- Will this work for auto insurance surrounded by Ontario?